Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

USS Spruance Rammed Engine Compartment of Touska — First Vessel Seizure During Blockade

The United States has physically seized an Iranian cargo vessel for the first time since the beginning of the maritime blockade: USS Spruance opened fire after six hours of warnings, Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz again, and oil prices rose.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 20, 2026 · 3 min read

USS Spruance Rammed Engine Compartment of Touska — First Vessel Seizure During Blockade
Фото: CENTCOM

On April 19, the guided-missile destroyer USS Spruance (DDG-111) opened fire on the engine compartment of Iranian container ship Touska in the Gulf of Oman, immobilizing the vessel. US Marines from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit, deployed from USS Tripoli, took the ship under guard. This is the first instance of physical seizure of a vessel since the naval blockade of Iranian ports was implemented on April 13 — all previous 13 interdictions ended with vessels being turned away without boarding.

How it happened

Touska — a container ship weighing 54,851 gross tons with a length of approximately 295 meters — was traveling at 17 knots on course for Bandar Abbas. For six hours, Spruance issued radio warnings.

"Motor vessel Touska, vacate your engine room — we're prepared to subject you to disabling fire"

Radio transmission from USS Spruance sailor, published by CENTCOM

After the crew ignored the commands, the destroyer fired several rounds from its 5-inch MK 45 gun into the engine compartment. The ship lost propulsion. CENTCOM's night video shows helicopters over Touska and a Marine descending to the deck on a rope.

Why Touska was not a random choice

The ship is connected to Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines (IRISL) — a state carrier under US Treasury Department sanctions since June 2020. According to OFAC, IRISL and its subsidiaries are involved in circumventing export controls and transporting cargo related to Iran's nuclear and military programs. Trump directly stated in his Truth Social post that the vessel is under sanctions "for prior illegal activity" — and promised to determine what is on board.

The blockade: what's at stake

Trump announced the blockade of Iranian ports on April 12, explaining that any vessels that have paid Iran a transit fee in yuan or cryptocurrency will be intercepted. The blockade involves over 10,000 military personnel and more than a dozen combat ships.

  • The cost to Iran — according to analysts' estimates, the blockade costs Tehran approximately $400 million per day in lost revenue
  • Oil market — Brent opened trading on Sunday at $95 per barrel; prices rose more than 4% following Touska's seizure and Iran's renewed closure of the Strait of Hormuz
  • Strait of Hormuz — on Sunday, no tanker crossed the strait according to tracking systems; it typically carries one-fifth of the world's oil supply
  • Deadline — by April 26, the blockade threatens irreversible damage to oil wells due to storage overflow

Iran responds — negotiations in question

Iran's unified command Khatam al-Anbiya called US actions "armed piracy" and a violation of the ceasefire agreement, promising retaliation — reported by Tasnim, an agency affiliated with the IRGC. Meanwhile, Tehran has again blocked most vessels from transiting the Strait of Hormuz.

The second round of peace negotiations was supposed to begin Monday in Pakistan with a delegation led by Vice President Vance. Iran has not publicly confirmed participation: some Iranian state media suggests the talks may not take place. The ceasefire, which both sides have already accused each other of violating, expires on Wednesday.

Key disagreements at the negotiations — control over enriched uranium stockpiles and conditions for opening the Strait of Hormuz — remain unresolved. If the ceasefire is not extended by Wednesday, and Touska becomes a precedent for new boardings, the question is not whether Iran will respond — but whether the response will remain in the maritime domain, or whether the conflict will escalate beyond it.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026