Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise
Business

Vienna court definitively rejects Dmytro Firtash's extradition

After more than eleven years of court proceedings in Austria, the U.S. request to extradite a businessman was definitively rejected; the case was complicated by a procedural error and a missed appeal deadline.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 10, 2025 · 1 min read

Vienna court definitively rejects Dmytro Firtash's extradition

An Austrian court has finally refused to hand over Ukrainian businessman Dmytro Firtash to US law enforcement after more than eleven years of legal disputes. During the process Firtash posted bail in a record amount of €125 million.

Court decision

The prosecution's appeal was dismissed

– Vienna Higher Regional Court

The Vienna Higher Regional Court confirmed that the lower court's ruling, which prohibited extradition to the United States, is final. The court cited formal grounds and the fact that the prosecution missed the deadline for filing an appeal as the basis for its decision.

Background of the arrest

Firtash was arrested in Austria in March 2014 at the request of prosecutors from Chicago. The United States accuses him of orchestrating a conspiracy to pay $18.5 million to Indian officials to facilitate a $500 million titanium investment.

Until 2019 the businessman appealed the decision in all Austrian instances and at that time was unable to stop the extradition procedure. In July 2019 the Austrian minister of justice approved Firtash's transfer to US authorities, but immediate extradition did not occur due to a defense motion for reconsideration, after which the Vienna District Criminal Court suspended the procedure.

Business activities and sanctions

Firtash denies the charges and says the prosecution is political and aimed at influencing the situation in Ukraine. After posting bail in 2014 he moved his business to Vienna and resides in Austria.

He built his fortune largely through gas trading, including deals with Russian Gazprom. After the collapse of the USSR he expanded operations into the chemical industry and television manufacturing and was considered one of Ukraine's influential businessmen.

  • Ukraine imposed sanctions against Firtash in 2021 over suspicions that he supplied titanium to weapons manufacturers in Russia.
  • The United Kingdom imposed sanctions on him in 2024.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026