Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Eight EU countries call for a ban on entry of Russians who fought in Ukraine — what would it mean for Schengen security?

Leaders of Germany, Poland, Romania, the Baltic states, Finland and Sweden are asking the European Commission to introduce targeted visa restrictions against Russian citizens involved in the aggression. We explain why this is not merely an emotional reaction but a move with concrete consequences for EU security and migration policy.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 13, 2026 · 2 min read

Eight EU countries call for a ban on entry of Russians who fought in Ukraine — what would it mean for Schengen security?
Прем'єр-міністр Польщі Дональд Туск і президент Литви Гітанас Науседа (фото - EPA)

What happened

Leaders of eight countries — Germany, Poland, Romania, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Finland and Sweden — sent a joint letter to the President of the European Council and the President of the European Commission proposing the introduction of targeted visa restrictions for Russian citizens who took part in the war against Ukraine. The initiative has already been covered by leading Western media, including Politico and DW.

Why it matters

The letter argues that people involved in armed aggression pose a serious threat to the EU's internal security — because of the risks of serious crimes, activity by organized crime networks, extremist groups and instrumentalization within hybrid operations. This is not only a matter of morality: it is about concrete security logic — how to cut off potential threats at the Schengen borders.

"Persons who participated in the war as part of the armed forces of the aggressor state constitute a serious threat to internal security..."

— Joint letter from the heads of state and government of Germany, Poland, Romania, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Finland and Sweden

Numbers and context

Key facts reinforce the argument: according to the appeal, more than 180 000 people were sent to the war from Russian prisons and colonies. At the same time, the tourism industry estimates that in 2025 Russian citizens filed around 620–670 thousand applications for Schengen visas, and approximately 4 out of 5 applicants received a visa. In other words, the scale of the flow is significant, and any vulnerable cases could have systemic consequences for member states.

Reactions and local initiatives

Estonia already proposed a general ban on entry for those who took part in the war at the beginning of 2026. Ukraine's foreign minister Andriy Sybiha openly supported the idea, stressing the need to protect European citizens from individuals involved in violence during the aggression.

"It is necessary to protect the citizens of European states from Russian bandits."

— Andriy Sybiha, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine

Lithuania's Ministry of the Interior has already reported preparing a list of people who will be banned from entry; Lithuanian Minister of the Interior Vladyslav Kondratovych estimates the number of such participants in the war to be in the hundreds of thousands.

What could change and what questions to expect

If the EU supports the initiative, we can expect changes to the visa code or mechanisms to coordinate refusals of visas and residence permits, as well as long-term entry bans across the entire Schengen area. This would create a legal precedent for preventing the return to Europe of those involved in war crimes and hybrid operations.

At the same time, questions about the evidentiary basis will arise: how to verify participation in hostilities, what legal safeguards are needed to protect against erroneous decisions, and how to prevent abuse. These details will be the subject of discussions at the EU summit on 19–20 March.

Conclusion

This initiative is an example of how security logic turns diplomatic statements into proposals for concrete tools. For Ukraine, it is important that allies not only acknowledge the threat but also implement mechanisms that genuinely reduce risks. The ball is now in the European Commission's and member states' court: will they be able to timely formulate legally robust rules that combine effectiveness and the protection of rights?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026