Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Ukraine's gas production has fallen to its lowest level in many years — and it's not just a statistic

2025: Ukraine produced 16.97 billion cubic meters of gas — 10% less than a year earlier. Behind the figure lie destroyed infrastructure, forced shutdowns of wells, and the question of whether private investment will manage to compensate for losses from missile strikes.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 4, 2026 · 2 min read

Ukraine's gas production has fallen to its lowest level in many years — and it's not just a statistic
Нафтогаз України (Фото: пресслужба групи)

Imagine a well in the Poltava region that had been producing gas for years. After a massive strike in the winter of 2024–2025 — it has gone silent. Multiply that by dozens of sites across the country, and you get the figure announced in May 2025 by Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal: 16.97 billion cubic meters — the lowest production figure in many years.

By comparison: in 2024 Ukraine produced over 19 billion cubic meters. The drop is more than 10% in a single year.

Missiles as a tool of energy degradation

Shmyhal explained the mechanics back in April 2025: during the winter, Russian strikes on gas production infrastructure destroyed capacities that provided almost 50% of total production. This is not a metaphor — these are concrete compressor stations, pipelines, and above-ground well infrastructure. They cannot be restored quickly: some facilities are located in areas at risk of repeated strikes.

That is why even a result described as “better than forecast” comes with a caveat. Yes, the official forecast had anticipated even less — Shmyhal said the outcome was 2.4 billion cubic meters higher than expected. But the comparison base was an already revised, lowered plan, not the pre-war potential of the sector.

Private firms rise — Ukrgazvydobuvannya declines

There is a split within the industry. Private companies increased output by 14%: they are more mobile, can reassign drilling crews faster, and are less dependent on centralized infrastructure that became a target. In contrast, the state-owned Ukrgazvydobuvannya, which accounts for the lion’s share of the overall figure, suffered the largest losses precisely because of the scale and geography of its assets.

This asymmetry matters: it means that recovery of production will depend not only on the security situation, but also on how ready the state is to give private capital — including foreign investors — real access to fields, and not just declarative invitations at conferences.

What this means for the energy balance

Ukraine consumes roughly as much gas as it produces — or imports the difference. With production below 17 billion cubic meters and consumption remaining at current levels, dependence on imports increases. In 2025 this is happening against the backdrop of the absence of Russian gas transit through the Ukrainian gas transmission system (GTS) — the agreement between Naftogaz and Gazprom was not renewed from 1 January 2025.

In other words, Ukraine has simultaneously lost transit revenue and part of its own production — and is forced to balance using underground storage and reverse flows from Europe.

Rebuilding under fire

The industry is trying to adapt: some companies are moving above-ground infrastructure underground or camouflaging it, investing in redundancy. But this costs money and time — two resources chronically in short supply in a wartime economy.

The open question remains: if the intensity of strikes on the energy sector does not decrease in 2025–2026, can a 14% increase in private production compensate for further losses in the state sector — or will we see another record low next year?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026