Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

800 MW freed: review of critical infrastructure registries will reduce scheduled power outages

The Cabinet of Ministers instructed regional military administrations (OVAs) to review the lists — small consumers and facilities with "dual" connections have been removed. That frees up an additional 800 MW and meaningfully reduces outage times for households and industry.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

December 16, 2025 · 2 min read

800 MW freed: review of critical infrastructure registries will reduce scheduled power outages

What happened

On December 9 the Cabinet of Ministers instructed regional military administrations to review the lists of critical infrastructure facilities. Following the inspection, as Prime Minister Yuliia Svyrydenko reported, it was possible to free up at least 800 MW of electrical capacity — this will make it possible to reduce the duration of outage schedules for households and businesses.

"As a result of the review we found the possibility to free up at least 800 MW of electrical capacity. This will affect the reduction of the duration of power outage schedules for people and industry. Two categories were removed from the lists: consumers with capacity under 100 kW and facilities to which a number of other consumers were connected, which — in order to ensure a fair distribution of electricity — fall under the general restrictions."

— Yuliia Svyrydenko, Prime Minister

Who this will help

Two categories were excluded from the lists: consumers up to 100 kW and facilities where "multiple connections" created disproportionate protection. The consequence — more resource for an even distribution of electricity across regions. Designated hospitals, life-support facilities and defense‑industrial enterprises remain outside these changes.

Why this matters now

After a massive cyberattack and strikes on the power system, the head of the board of Ukrenergo warned that recovery will take weeks. That means: while networks are limited in capacity, management decisions about distribution priorities become a key tool to mitigate the effects.

"After the massive Russian attack, the restoration of Ukraine's power system will take weeks."

— Head of the board of Ukrenergo

Analysis and consequences

Energy experts note: 800 MW is not an instant "recovery" of the grid, but it is a significant reserve to reduce outage time during peak hours. The practical effect — more stable operation of industrial enterprises, logistics and utility services; for household consumers — shorter outage schedules and a lower risk of prolonged inconveniences.

The decision also has a social component: removing small consumers and "double" connections from the registers increases fairness in the distribution of limited resources.

What next

This review is an operational measure. Next it should be combined with repairs of damaged sections of the network and investments in system resilience. Moreover, changes in the registers may be adjusted depending on shifts in the operational situation and the technical condition of the networks.

After the government's statement, the expert community stresses: declarations must turn into clear allocation algorithms and transparent monitoring so the saved 800 MW are used as effectively as possible for society.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026