Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Japan invested $16 billion in chips that don't yet exist: a bet on Rapidus with built-in nationalization rights

Tokyo approved new subsidies worth $4 billion for state-backed startup Rapidus — a company that has yet to release any mass-produced chips but is already in negotiations with over 60 potential clients. The main client and simultaneous shareholder is Fujitsu.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 11, 2026 · 2 min read

Japan invested $16 billion in chips that don't yet exist: a bet on Rapidus with built-in nationalization rights
Генеральний директор Rapidus Ацуєсі Коїке (фото - Аріса Моріяма / Nikkey Asia)

In July 2025, at the Rapidus facility in Chitose (Hokkaido), the first test wafers were manufactured using 2 nm technology. Mass production has not yet begun — it is scheduled for 2027. However, the Japanese government has already invested the equivalent of $16.3 billion in the project and shows no signs of stopping.

What Japan is buying with this money

Rapidus is not an ordinary startup. It was founded in 2022 by eight corporations: Toyota, SoftBank, Sony, NEC, Kioxia, Mitsubishi UFJ Bank and others, with initial capital of ¥7.3 billion. The state entered as the primary investor — and retained the right to convert non-preferred shares into ordinary shares, effectively gaining a mechanism for forced control over the company if something goes wrong.

"Since the beginning of the year, customer demand for advanced chips has increased sharply"

— CEO Rapidus Atsuyoshi Koike, February 2026

New subsidies of ¥631.5 billion ($4 billion) are earmarked specifically for Fujitsu — the first confirmed customer. Fujitsu, in turn, is considering an investment of up to ¥20 billion in Rapidus itself. In other words, Japan is financing a company that manufactures chips for a customer who is itself its shareholder.

The technology gap that must be bridged

Today, Japan's most advanced domestic capacity is 40 nm. TSMC already produces 2 nm at industrial scale and is developing 1.6–1.4 nm. Rapidus uses High-NA EUV equipment from ASML and technical support from IBM — approximately 10 IBM engineers work constantly at the Chitose facility. After 2 nm, the goal is 1.4 nm, and then 1 nm. The total cost of this path is estimated to exceed ¥7 trillion.

  • The state has already allocated: ~¥2.9 trillion
  • Needs to attract from banks and private investors: ~¥4 trillion
  • Private sector in the latest round: ¥130 billion — from 32 companies, including Sony, Toyota, Canon, and Seiko Epson

Why private business remains cautious

Despite a growing list of shareholders, private investors remain significantly more cautious than the state — due to technological uncertainty and the absence of a confirmed order portfolio. According to Digitimes, regional banks are only "coordinating possible investments," and the final figures of participants may still change. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba publicly acknowledged that taxpayer spending requires a clear strategy — but emphasized that falling behind in the global semiconductor race would be irreversible.

In parallel, Rapidus is in negotiations with over 60 potential customers in AI, robotics, and edge computing, including American startup Tenstorrent, which develops RISC-V processors as an alternative to Nvidia.

The bet is made, but not confirmed

Japan lost its leadership in chips in the 1990s, when Samsung and TSMC surpassed NEC, Hitachi, and Mitsubishi Electric. Rapidus is an attempt at a comeback not through catch-up, but through a leap directly to the cutting edge. There is a precedent: TSMC's involvement in Kumamoto showed that state subsidies can change industrial geography.

But TSMC came with established production. Rapidus starts from scratch — with first test wafers, an ambitious 2027 deadline, and a state that legally can take control of the company if it fails to deliver.

If by the end of 2026 Rapidus does not sign contracts with several customers independent of the state — the investment risks becoming the most expensive industrial experiment in Japanese history without commercial results.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026