Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Japanese chemical giants cut ethylene production: Strait of Hormuz blockade hits global supply chains, with implications for Ukraine

Mitsubishi Chemical and Idemitsu Kosan have suspended part of their ethylene production due to a shortage of ligroin following the blockage of the Strait of Hormuz. We explain why this is not just a Japanese problem and how it could affect prices and logistics — including for Ukraine.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 9, 2026 · 2 min read

Japanese chemical giants cut ethylene production: Strait of Hormuz blockade hits global supply chains, with implications for Ukraine
Завод компанії Mitsubishi Chemical у Сакаїді, Кагава , Японія (фото - Вікіпедія)

What happened

According to reports from Nikkei and Nippon, the Mitsubishi Chemical group has begun cutting ethylene production at its complex in Ibaraki Prefecture. The reason is a shortage of the petroleum distillate ligroin, whose supplies have been disrupted by a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz amid regional escalation.

The Ibaraki plant has a capacity of about 485,000 tonnes per year, roughly 8% of Japan's total ethylene output. Idemitsu Kosan has also warned business partners of potential suspensions at its Yamaguchi and Chiba sites — together accounting for about 16% more of the nation's capacity.

Why it matters

About 20% of global oil and LNG shipments pass through the Strait of Hormuz — disruptions to this route quickly reverberate through feedstock flows for refining and the chemical industry. As LIGA.net explains, such interruptions have already pushed fuel prices in several regions.

Ethylene is a basic feedstock for producing polymers and plastics. A prolonged reduction in output means lower inventories of finished products, longer recovery times after shutdowns, and increased price pressure across global supply chains.

"This step is intended to avoid stoppages due to an expected reduction in supply."

— Mitsubishi Chemical, official statement

Impacts for markets and for Ukraine

In the short term — higher prices for polymers and fuel due to reduced shipments and logistical delays. In the medium term — a redistribution of supplies: companies will seek alternative sources of ligroin or reconfigure production lines.

For Ukraine this has several practical dimensions: first, rising global fuel prices increase logistics and energy costs; second, shortages of certain polymers can complicate deliveries of materials for industrial production and infrastructure restoration. Thus, even geographically distant shocks affect our economic and defense readiness.

What’s next

Mitsubishi plans to cut production and coordinate with customers, and some facilities have scheduled maintenance of about two months — a period during which usual inventories could be exhausted. If the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz continues, the measures expected from Japanese firms could turn into a longer period of constraints.

Experts and leading publications (Nikkei, Nippon, LIGA.net) point out that the current consequences are an opportunity for European and Ukrainian importers to reassess supply chains, strengthen diversification, and build contingency mechanisms. The decisions governments and companies make in the coming weeks will determine whether this remains a temporary shock or becomes a more lasting market realignment.

Summary: the situation is a telling demonstration of how military-political escalation in one part of the world can disrupt industrial cycles at the other end. The question for us is: how swiftly can business and the state minimize the effects on Ukraine's energy and material security?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026