Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

EU adds Chinese chip manufacturer to sanctions list — and immediately proposes ignoring it

The European Commission included Yangzhou Yangjie Electronic in the 20th sanctions package against Russia and almost simultaneously proposed a nine-month exemption — because without these microchips, European auto plants would come to a stop.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 22, 2026 · 2 min read

EU adds Chinese chip manufacturer to sanctions list — and immediately proposes ignoring it
Фото: EPA / RONALD WITTEK

Yangzhou Yangjie Electronic manufactures diodes and transistors used in automotive electronics worldwide. The company was included in the EU's 20th sanctions package against Russia as a supplier of dual-use components. However, just the next day after the package was announced, an EU Commission spokesperson confirmed to Reuters that the Commission was simultaneously proposing a nine-month exemption for the same company to member states.

Why automakers became hostages

Yangzhou Yangjie is not a marginal supplier. The company is part of several global supply chains for Bosch, Continental, and other Tier-1 automotive suppliers. An abrupt refusal to use its products without a transition period threatens shutdown of production lines at factories in Germany, France, and the Czech Republic — precisely what the Commission calls "serious disruptions."

According to the EU Commission spokesman, nine months should give manufacturers time to find alternative suppliers of similar semiconductors — primarily in Japan, South Korea, or among European producers.

"The exemption does not mean lifting sanctions. The company remains on the list, and deals with it after the transition period would violate EU law."

EU Commission Spokesman, Reuters

Unanimity — the main trap

The exemption requires unanimous approval from all 27 EU member states to take effect. This is the same procedure that has already slowed down or diluted sanctions decisions several times: a single veto is enough — and the exemption does not apply, leaving automakers facing a tough deadline without legal certainty.

Economist at the Kyiv School of Economics Yuriy Haidai notes that such "technical exemptions" represent a systemic vulnerability in the EU's sanctions architecture: the more integrated the supply chain, the more painful the disruption — and the stronger the lobbying pressure for an exemption. According to him, Chinese component manufacturers understand this and deliberately build their presence in critical sectors.

What this means for sanctions pressure on Russia

Yangzhou Yangjie Electronic was added to the list because its components were found in Russian military equipment, including fragments of Iranian Shahed drones, according to Conflict Armament Research analysts. The nine-month pause does not cancel this fact — but it gives the company time to continue operating in a "gray zone" until the restrictions fully take effect.

  • 20th sanctions package — the most comprehensive in terms of number of entities sanctioned since the start of the full-scale invasion
  • Yangzhou Yangjie — one of the first Chinese semiconductor companies subject to direct EU sanctions
  • Nine months — the standard transition period the EU previously applied to energy contracts

If even one EU member state blocks the exemption, automakers will get not nine months but several weeks — precisely until the date the main package takes effect. Whether Berlin and Paris are willing to take such a risk for the sake of sanctions consistency will become clear at the upcoming meeting of the EU Council on Foreign Affairs.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026