Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

EU Paid Russia €2.88 Billion for Yamal Gas — and This Before Peak Purchasing Season

As Brussels prepares a ban on Russian LNG from 2027, European buyers have increased imports from Siberia's Yamal LNG by 17% — and structurally depend on these supplies for at least another year.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 10, 2026 · 2 min read

EU Paid Russia €2.88 Billion for Yamal Gas — and This Before Peak Purchasing Season
Ілюстративне фото: depositphotos.com

In the first quarter of 2026, Europe imported 5 million tons of liquefied gas from the Russian "Yamal LNG" project — 17% more than in the first quarter of 2025. According to data from analytical company Kpler, published by environmental organization Urgewald, the bill for the EU amounted to approximately €2.88 billion ($3.33 billion) for three months.

Why now — and why so much

Two factors converged simultaneously. First, Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz disrupted global LNG tanker routes: maritime traffic in the strait fell by 70%, and freight rates for gas carriers reached record levels. Second, "Yamal LNG" is physically tied to Europe: 97% of its exports go to European terminals.

The reason is structural, not political. For winter Arctic voyages, Yamal uses a fleet of 14 specialized icebreaking Arc7 tankers. They can only be unloaded at a few ports capable of receiving them. Regular LNG gas carriers (non-Arc7) can enter the Ob Bay only in summer — from June to November. In other words, in winter there is no alternative: either Europe or idle.

"The EU holds the greatest leverage over Yamal LNG — a strategic advantage it has yet to use".

Sebastian Rötters, researcher and campaigner at Urgewald

According to Urgewald, in 2025 the EU spent a total of €7.2 billion on gas from Yamal. The largest buyer is France (6.3 million tons), followed by Belgium (4.2 million tons). In February 2026, all 21 shipments from Yamal for the first time since 2018 went exclusively to EU countries — none to Asia.

What economists say

Analyst Paweł Czyzak from energy analytical center Ember argues that a ban on Russian LNG would trigger neither a price shock nor supply problems. "The removal of Russian LNG from the mix is unlikely to affect prices — and certainly will not affect supply security", he said in a comment to S&P Global.

However, critics point out: the EU chose to postpone action itself. The decision to ban Russian LNG from the beginning of 2027 (pipeline gas from 2028) was adopted by Brussels in December 2025. The official reasoning — to give buyers time to renegotiate contracts without price spikes. The unofficial reality — France, Belgium and Spain actively increased purchases in anticipation of the ban.

A shadow ahead

Urgewald warns of another risk: when charter agreements for Arc7 tankers expire, Russia could transfer them to the "shadow fleet". This means that even after the EU's official ban, tracking and stopping supplies will be significantly more difficult — as has already happened with oil.

  • €2.88 billion — EU payments to Russia for just the first quarter of 2026
  • €7.2 billion — total amount for the entire 2025 year
  • 14 Arc7 tankers — the entire fleet that maintains winter supplies
  • 97% of Yamal exports — the share going to Europe

If by the end of 2026 the EU does not introduce a mechanism to control the transition of Arc7 tankers under new flags, the official 2027 ban risks becoming a declaration — not a real break in energy relations with Russia.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026