Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Business

Sunflower Oil Processing Plants Stop Operations — Impact Already Visible in Oil Exports

When raw materials are more expensive than the final product, it makes more sense to shut down the production line than to start it up. Ukrainian oil processing enterprises have reached exactly this logic — and the market is already feeling the effects.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 20, 2026 · 2 min read

Sunflower Oil Processing Plants Stop Operations — Impact Already Visible in Oil Exports
Фото: Depositphotos

Sergiy Repetskyi, partner of Swiss brokerage company Sunstone Brokers, described the situation concisely: at sunflower prices of 33,000–34,000 UAH per ton, processing margins simply do not exist. The plants that are still operating do so using raw material stocks formed in March-April. Taking new batches at such prices is unprofitable.

The gap between raw materials and oil

The problem is not that sunflower prices suddenly surged — but rather that sunflower prices rose faster than prices for the finished product. According to Spike Brokers data, the sunflower indicative price rose to $709 per ton (CPT, processing), while sunflower oil did not respond to such dynamics. The difference between raw material value and product value — that is the margin that disappeared.

The consequence is massive reorientation. Most processing plants switched to soy and rapeseed, where profitability remained. Domestic prices for crude sunflower oil jumped to 58,000–60,000 UAH per ton ($1,160–1,200/t) on FCA-plant terms, while just a few months ago the picture was fundamentally different.

What this means for the market

A shortage of sunflower oil within the country is already a fact recorded by APK-Inform. But there is also an external dimension: according to Forbes Ukraine, in August 2025, sunflower oil exports fell to a three-year low. The 2024/2025 season turned out to be the most difficult for sunflower processing in recent years.

"In Ukraine, at the end of the 2024–2025 marketing year, there is a deficit in sunflower oil supply caused by limited sunflower supply and the transition of most plants to processing soy and rapeseed."

APK-Inform

In parallel, another story is unfolding — the rapeseed story. Thanks to the export duty on raw rapeseed, domestic processing in the 2025/26 marketing year increased 2.6 times, and rapeseed oil exports, according to UKAB forecast, will increase 2.7 times — to 576 thousand tons. Plants are not idle — they have simply switched focus.

Structural shift, not seasonal pause

An important nuance: Ukraine traditionally processed all sunflower domestically — this was the main competitive rule of the industry. Now the same processing capacity serves other crops. The infrastructure has not disappeared — its content has changed.

  • Sunflower oil becomes more expensive due to shortage, but this has not yet created new incentives to process sunflower — the raw material price is not falling either.
  • Rapeseed received structural protection through the duty, and processors have already incorporated this signal into their plans.
  • Soy occupies an intermediate position — both processed and exported depending on market conditions.

If in the new 2025/26 season the sunflower price does not drop back to levels where processing becomes profitable again, Ukraine may enter the next year with chronically reduced sunflower oil production — and lose part of the markets that have already begun seeking alternative suppliers, including India, which actively purchased Ukrainian oil this season.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026