Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Community

60 Appeals in Nine Days: Why Irpin Residents Call the First Deputy — and What Comes of It

# New "Hotline" by Oleksandr Paschynsky in Battered Irpin Registers Requests: Emergency Trees, Bus Stops, Tariffs — Utilities Recovery Still Incomplete A new "hotline" launched by Oleksandr Paschynsky in the war-affected city of Irpin is logging citizen complaints: fallen trees, damaged bus stops, utility rate issues — basic infrastructure restoration remains unfinished. However, there remains a significant gap between "promptly forwarding requests to utilities" and actual results, which the hotline has yet to bridge.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 9, 2026 · 2 min read

60 Appeals in Nine Days: Why Irpin Residents Call the First Deputy — and What Comes of It

Over the first nine working days, approximately 60 calls were received at the number 0 800 335 191 — an average of six to seven per day. This is the "hotline" of Irpin City's First Deputy Mayor Oleksandr Paschynsky, which started operating in 2025. The number may be small, but the topics speak volumes.

What concerns people after reconstruction

Among the main issues are emergency trees, problems with public transport stops, and utility rates. At first glance — minor details. In reality — a marker: three years after the occupation, Irpin is rebuilding walls faster than it is restoring basic city services.

Irpin City Council developed one of the most detailed reconstruction plans in Ukraine — with addresses, number of residents, and reconstruction costs. But "hotlines" record what doesn't make it into the plans: a tree leaning over a children's playground, a bus stop without a shelter, an incomprehensible utility bill.

How the line works — and where its boundaries are

Schedule — Monday to Friday, 08:00–17:00. Calls are forwarded to relevant utility enterprises and structural departments. In other words, the line is currently an aggregator, not a decision-making center: it collects signals but has no independent execution resources.

"Every call will be processed and will receive an immediate response. We are working to be closer to people and to resolve important community issues faster."

Oleksandr Paschynsky, First Deputy Mayor of Irpin

In parallel, Paschynsky conducts traditional Wednesday public receptions — and there are also queues there: questions about major repairs suspended in 2024 due to lack of funding from the Recovery Service, requests from military personnel regarding budget allocation, complaints from residents about frozen work.

Domestic reconstruction as a separate front

Irpin is a symbolic city: the first city liberated after the full-scale invasion, and the first where a detailed reconstruction plan appeared. But symbolism doesn't remove emergency trees. Six calls a day — this is not an anomaly, it is a stable background request from the community that has returned and wants the city to function, not just look reconstructed.

What will matter is not the number of calls accepted, but the share of closed requests with confirmed results. If the line introduces public reporting — at least monthly statistics of "received / forwarded / resolved" — it will become a tool to pressure utilities. If not, it risks becoming a buffer that relieves social tension without solving problems.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026