Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Community

Energy Hell Near Kyiv: When the Private Interests of Regional Power Companies Become a Threat to People's Lives

While the country fights an external enemy, residents of the Kyiv region have found themselves in the grip of internal inaction. Sofiivska Borshchahivka and Bilohorodka have been living for a month in a reality where seeing your breath in the room is the norm and flushing the toilet with a basin is a daily quest.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 27, 2026 · 2 min read

Energy Hell Near Kyiv: When the Private Interests of Regional Power Companies Become a Threat to People's Lives

Ice age 20 kilometers from the capital

Imagine: brutal frosts outside, and +8°C in your home. You try to heat 110 square meters with two portable fan heaters during those miserable three hours when the power comes on, but the appliances barely work because of low voltage. This is not footage from an apocalypse movie, but the daily survival of thousands of Ukrainians in the Bucha district as of January 2026.

The situation is critical:

  • Around 1,000 homes in Kyiv itself remain without heating, and in the Kyiv region that number reaches thousands.
  • Nearly 60% of residents of the capital and adjacent districts are constantly without electricity.
  • The energy collapse has halted water supply: people are forced to flush toilets using basins, and frozen feces have become the new housing-and-utility reality.

Why transformers are burning: Attacks or systemic greed?

Western analysts and energy experts emphasize: you cannot blame everything solely on missiles. The war has merely exposed the metastases of a system that has rotten for years. While officials report "schedules", in Sofiivska Borshchahivka (group 2.1) transformers are burning in open flames.

The reason is cynical and simple: equipment designed for 50 private homes was for years overloaded with new townhouses and shops. "They collected connection fees, added extra load — and now the networks are simply melting," residents complain. This is not merely a technical error; it's systemic neglect of safety for the sake of profit.

"We're tired of getting sick. The house is fully electrified, there's no gas. We depend on electricity that effectively doesn't exist, even when the schedules say it's 'on'. It's 8°C in the house — that's not living, it's survival."

– A resident of Sofiivska Borshchahivka

Wall of indifference: How the regional power company stonewalls people

When an outraged community went to the oblenergo office with a collective complaint, they were met not by problem-solvers but by locked doors. People waited for hours to be received while their passport details were recorded with no guarantees of help. The monopoly's internal communication is paralyzed: operators often brush off requests, claiming that people allegedly have power, even though entire neighborhoods remain in darkness.

Community strength against systemic collapse

This story could have ended tragically if not for the effect of social proof and solidarity. Tired of waiting for oblenergo repair crews, the residents of Bilohorodka self-organized. The community themselves found specialists who were able to restore the electrical panel, proving: when private entities fail to act, only unity saves.

Context: War demands meticulous work from energy professionals, but it does not absolve responsibility for decisions made long before the shelling. Miscalculations in managing strategic assets carry too high a price — one people are paying today with their own health.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026