Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Community

Ferris wheel in Podil to be dismantled despite positive expert assessment — what this means for Kyiv

After a series of orders from the municipal inspection and a petition from the prosecutor's office, the Ferris wheel's owner agreed to dismantle it. The decision affects not only the attraction but also trust in procedures and the management of urban space — we examine why this matters.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 26, 2025 · 2 min read

Ferris wheel in Podil to be dismantled despite positive expert assessment — what this means for Kyiv

Briefly

On Podil, dismantling of the "Panoramic Ferris Wheel" has begun — the owner is complying with an inspection order following a prosecutor's decision. This happened despite a positive Periodic Technical Inspection Act dated 21 October 2025 and findings by the "Interregional Expert and Technical Center" that confirmed the structure's safety. The information was published by the Official Kyiv Portal and UNN.

What happened and why it matters

The Department of Territorial Control reported the closure of the attraction at the prosecutor's request; the owner received an official demand from the municipal improvement inspection and agreed to carry out the dismantling at his own expense. Earlier, the prosecutor's office had applied to the court requesting seizure and a ban on operating the wheel due to an alleged unsatisfactory condition.

"Specialists from the Department repeatedly issued an order to dismantle the attraction. In particular, the latest order was issued on 22 December this year. In addition, employees of the municipal improvement inspection drew up an administrative protocol against the owners of the attraction."

— Mykhailo Budilov, director of the Department of Territorial Control

Technical condition of the attraction

The wheel was installed in 2017. According to the most recent technical inspection act of 21.10.2025, the metal structures, components and mechanisms withstood the tests; no cracks or deformations were found — a conclusion provided by the "Interregional Expert and Technical Center." This creates a logical tension: when official technical expertise attests to safety, yet inspections and the prosecutor's office insist on dismantling.

Legal logic and consequences for the city

The decision to dismantle the attraction more reflects legal dominance over technical expertise: the prosecutor's office can initiate processes that compel the owner to act, even if the structure has passed inspections. For Kyiv residents this is a matter of trust — in the institutions that regulate public space, and in the transparency of decisions that affect business and leisure.

What's next

The city administration is negotiating the possible relocation of the attraction to another site. This will affect jobs and the accessibility of the city center for family recreation. Key issues will be the timelines for dismantling, the clarity of criteria for relocation, and a public explanation of the authorities' steps.

Conclusion

The situation in Podil is not simply a story about an attraction. It is a test for the city: can Kyiv combine legal responsibility and respect for professional expertise without losing public space and residents' trust? After dismantling, attention should turn to a transparent action plan regarding the location, safety, and compensation for businesses.

Sources: Official Kyiv Portal, UNN reports, Periodic Technical Inspection Act (21.10.2025), conclusions of the "Interregional Expert and Technical Center".

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026