Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Culture

Benedict Pedonn - the woman who prints future tribunals

In the very heart of Paris, among the narrow streets of the Latin Quarter, there exists a place where law sounds not as a dry code, but as the memory of humanity. There are no loud signs here or tourist queues. Words live here. The very same words that once became the foundation of the Nuremberg Trial. The very same words by which the world today tries to name the evil that came to Ukraine.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 6, 2026 · 3 min read

Benedict Pedonn - the woman who prints future tribunals
```html

This is where Benedikt Pedonne works — co-owner and director of the legendary French publishing house A. Pedone.

An intellectual fortress of international law

It is not just a publishing house. It is an intellectual fortress of international law that has existed continuously since 1837. Seven generations of the Pedonne family have published books that shaped Europe's legal architecture. Here were printed works by jurists, diplomats, researchers of war crimes — everyone who tried to answer one question: how should humanity judge evil.

Benedikt continues this work together with her husband Arnold. But there is no aristocratic distance or academic coldness in her voice. She speaks about law as if it were living matter. As if justice is not an abstraction, but a way to restore human dignity after catastrophe.

"Discussion in law is discussion with words"

— Benedikt Pedonne

Photo 2026 05 06 16 18 28

The publishing house that published the word "genocide"

The world knows Raphael Lemkin as the man who created the term "genocide." But few know that it was precisely the Pedone publishing house that published his work — long before international law became a global language after World War II. At the time, these were just books. Small print runs. Intellectual discussions. But they later became the foundation for international courts and tribunals.

Benedikt speaks of Lemkin not as a museum figure. For her, he is a man whose idea still works.

"It was Lemkin who developed the concept of genocide — he even created this word. Today we speak of 'ecocide' — and this too is, in a sense, a continuation of his concept"

— Benedikt Pedonne

There is something symbolic in this: wars begin with weapons, but end with words. It is precisely through legal formulations that humanity defines the boundary between war and crime.

Photo 2026 05 06 16 18 28 (2)

A bookstore where war ends

For the Ukrainian delegation that came to Paris, this bookstore became more than just a location. It became the final point of a conversation about justice. On the shelves — publications from the Hague Academy of International Law, research on tribunals, diplomacy, human rights.

For Ukraine, the thesis that every war ends "under the aegis of international law" sounds almost existential. Because it is not only about punishing specific criminals. It is about the legal definition of the very phenomenon of Rashism — an attempt to fix evil not only historically, but also legally.

Benedikt Pedonne has been printing texts for decades about international accountability, mechanisms of punishment, the right of peoples to protection. Her work is a quiet, unnoticed struggle to ensure that the language of justice remains in the world.

"We opened our doors because it could have happened to us"

But Benedikt reveals herself most not as a publishing house director, but as a person. After the full-scale war began, she took in Ukrainians in her home. And she speaks about it without pathos.

"We received more than we gave when we welcomed Ukrainians. We opened our home because it could have happened to us too"

— Benedikt Pedonne

This phrase most accurately explains the Europe that Ukraine is trying to preserve today. Not the Europe of declarations — the Europe of compassion and human solidarity.

3

Small print runs that change history

Pedone does not publish mass literature. Their books are read by a few thousand people in the world — mostly in French, often in very complex legal language. But it is precisely these texts that are cited by judges of international tribunals, university professors, and lawyers in war crimes cases.

"We try to publish international law so that it serves peace in the world"

— Benedikt Pedonne

And in this lies the paradox of our time: sometimes a small Paris bookstore influences the future more strongly than dozens of political summits. Because weapons stop an army. But law stops the repetition of crime.

And as long as people like Benedikt Pedonne exist, the world has a chance not to forget the difference between force and justice.

```

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026