Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Culture

Dan Simmons has died — author of 'Hyperion' and 'The Terror': what remains of the writer who shaped contemporary science fiction

A world-renowned author and recipient of the Hugo and Locus awards has died at 77 in Colorado. We examine why his work matters not only to the genre but also to cultural memory in times of trial.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 2, 2026 · 2 min read

Dan Simmons has died — author of 'Hyperion' and 'The Terror': what remains of the writer who shaped contemporary science fiction

The Guardian reports the death of Dan Simmons at the age of 77; this information was also circulated by national agencies, including UNN. For the reader this is more than news about the loss of an individual artist: it marks the end of an era in intellectual science fiction that influenced ideas about the future, history and the boundaries of the genre.

Path and legacy

Dan Simmons left behind more than 30 novels, among them Song of Kali, The Hyperion Cantos, Ilium and the historical thriller The Terror. Over his career he received prestigious awards — including the Hugo and Locus — and influenced how writers combine scientific ideas with the literary tradition.

He turned his early years, including many years working as an elementary school teacher, into an advantage: the ability to explain complex matters in accessible language became one of the hallmarks of his narrative worlds. His first major success came in 1985 with Song of Kali, and later the author created epic cycles that spawned TV adaptations and attracted new generations of readers.

"Dan Simmons left behind a legacy of more than 30 novels that fundamentally changed modern science fiction and the horror genre"

— The Guardian

Political controversies and the later years of his work

In the later stages of his career some of his works provoked sharp debates because of political positions that some readers and critics considered controversial (notably the novel "Flashback"). Simmons himself rejected labels of radicalism, emphasizing his own experience in civic activism and the multifaceted nature of his intellectual stance.

It is important to separate artistic output from political judgments: his works often dealt with large themes — memory, responsibility, the limits of human knowledge — which continue to provoke discussion regardless of the author's personal views.

Why this matters now

At a time when nations defend not only territory but also culture and narratives, the legacy of authors capable of rendering complex ideas in an accessible form takes on added significance. Simmons’s works are not only entertainment; they are rehearsals of ethical thought experiments and technological scenarios that help the reader think about the future.

It is expected that interest in his novels and screen adaptations will remain. For the Ukrainian reader this is also a reminder: cultural memory and a broad discourse about the future are important elements of resistance to totalitarian narratives.

In summary: a renowned master of the genre has died, whose work shaped perceptions of the boundaries of science fiction and horror. It is now the role of critics, translators and readers to preserve and reinterpret this legacy in light of new challenges.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026