Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Culture

UNESCO places 19 Ukrainian heritage sites under enhanced protection

On December 4, the UNESCO Committee supported Ukraine's proposal and added 19 sites to the International List of Cultural Property under Enhanced Protection. The total number of Ukrainian monuments on the list has increased to 46, the minister of culture reported.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 5, 2025 · 2 min read

UNESCO places 19 Ukrainian heritage sites under enhanced protection

On December 4 the UNESCO Committee for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict supported Ukraine’s application and decided to include a further 19 Ukrainian cultural heritage sites in the International List under Enhanced Protection. The information was announced by the Vice Prime Minister for Humanitarian Policy, Minister of Culture Tetiana Berezhna.

Decision of the UNESCO Committee

This places Ukraine among the countries with the largest number of monuments that have received the highest international protection; we will continue to expand the list and strengthen the legal mechanisms for their safeguarding

– Tetiana Berezhna, Vice Prime Minister for Humanitarian Policy, Minister of Culture of Ukraine

According to the ministry’s announcement, following this decision the total number of Ukrainian sites on the list under Enhanced Protection has reached 46.

List of added sites

  • Akkerman Fortress, Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi, Odesa region
  • Assumption Cathedral, Kharkiv
  • Borys and Hlib Cathedral, Chernihiv
  • Kharkiv Academic Ukrainian Drama Theatre named after Taras Shevchenko, Kharkiv
  • Kirche building (St. Paul’s Church), Odesa
  • L.Ye. Kenig Estate: Palace (Main House), Trostianets, Sumy region
  • Movchansky Monastery, Putyvl, Sumy region
  • Pokrovska Church, Kharkiv
  • Primorsky Stairs, Odesa
  • Church of the Resurrection, Sumy
  • Kyrylivska Church (St. Cyril’s Church), Kyiv
  • Transfiguration Cathedral, Sumy
  • Trinity Cathedral, Sumy
  • Hillfort of the chronicle city of Iskorosten, Korosten, Zhytomyr region
  • Archaeological complex "Bayda Island", Zaporizhzhia
  • Odesa Museum of Western and Eastern Art, Odesa
  • Odesa National Art Museum, Odesa
  • Odesa National Scientific Library, Odesa
  • Prykarpattia Art Museum, Ivano-Frankivsk

Criteria and legal status

Enhanced protection is provided for by the Second Protocol to the 1954 Hague Convention. To receive this status a site must meet three main requirements: have exceptional value for humanity; be protected at the national level through appropriate legal and administrative measures; not be used for military purposes and have an official statement from the party controlling the site that it will not be used for military purposes.

Sites under Enhanced Protection enjoy the highest level of protection under the Second Protocol. Violations of their “immunity” are classified as grave breaches of the protocol, which may entail international responsibility for both states and individuals.

It is also noted that Russia was not elected to the composition of several intergovernmental councils and coordinating bodies of UNESCO, in particular programmes related to information, communication development and the "Man and the Biosphere" network.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026