Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Education

"6-7" Tops Ranking of Redundant Words — What It Reveals About Gen Z's Language and Why We Should Pay Attention

The abbreviation "6‑7" was the top entry on the 50th list of Lake Superior State University. It's not just a linguistic novelty — it's a signal about how social media shape communication and why, in times of instability, the precision of language matters.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

January 1, 2026 · 2 min read

"6-7" Tops Ranking of Redundant Words — What It Reveals About Gen Z's Language and Why We Should Pay Attention

In brief: The tongue-in-cheek ranking of redundant phrases was topped by the abbreviation «6‑7». We examine why this internet meme made the Lake Superior State University's 50‑word list and what it means for speech culture — particularly in Ukraine, where precision of messaging has strategic importance.

About the list and its authority

The annual "List of Banished Words" of Lake Superior State University (founded in 1976) tracks phrases that, through overuse or misuse, lose their meaning. In 2025 the abbreviation «6‑7» took first place, having gone viral among Generation Z. The top ten also included the words demure, incentivize, perfect, gift/gifted, my bad and reach out.

"The list reflects conversational trends forming on social networks. Terms that spread without the context of intonation or body language are easily distorted and drained of meaning."

— David Travis, president of Lake Superior State University

Why «6‑7» became a hit — and whether it matters that Dictionary.com named it word of the year

First, it's an example of how in‑group internet jokes can quickly spill out of a platform and become a generational marker. Second, attention from major lexicographical resources (for example, Dictionary.com choosing it as "word of the year") adds breadth to the trend and makes it a subject of public discussion.

"Often it's more of an in‑group internet joke: the word lives within a narrow circle and loses contact with the broader linguistic context."

— Editors of Dictionary.com

What it means for Ukraine: language culture, identity and security

For the Ukrainian reader three practical consequences are important. First, youth creativity is a cultural resource that should be understood and used, not simply dismissed as "nonsense." Second, ephemeral memes show how easily information loses precision — critically important when communicating about security and aid. Third, language adapts: trends come and go, but it is up to us which borrowings take root in our culture of usage.

Outlook

Analysts and lexicographers mostly agree: viral words often fade quickly. A quick wave of attention does not mean a long‑term change in language. At the same time, such phenomena are a useful reminder: in the battle for attention clarity of message, not volume, matters. For Ukraine this means preserving linguistic precision and adaptability — values that work both in culture and in information security.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026