Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Education

Kyiv temporarily consolidates schools and kindergartens after strike — how the city preserves in-person learning

After the large-scale attack on February 12 that left 315 educational buildings without heating, the capital is consolidating institutions across five districts. We explain how the scheme works, which districts were hit hardest, and what this means for parents and schools.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 13, 2026 · 2 min read

Kyiv temporarily consolidates schools and kindergartens after strike — how the city preserves in-person learning

What happened and why it matters

After the shelling on February 12, damage to critical infrastructure left 315 buildings of educational institutions in Kyiv without heating — including 163 kindergartens and 141 schools (more than 30% of the total number of institutions). This was reported by the Kyiv City State Administration, according to UNN. In response, the city is temporarily consolidating educational institutions to maintain in-person learning in premises with adequate conditions.

The most difficult situations are currently in the Holosiivskyi, Darnytskyi, Desnianskyi, Dniprovskiy and Pecherskyi districts. At the same time, heating in educational institutions is stable in the Obolonskyi, Podilskyi and Sviatoshynskyi districts.

How it works in practice

The mechanism is simple but resource-intensive: children are transferred to neighboring institutions that have heat and backup technical capacity. For example, Gymnasium No. 11, which serves as a resilience hub, accepted pupils from Primary School No. 103 thanks to a mobile boiler unit. Similarly, Lyceum No. 141 took in some students from Primary School No. 182, and almost 40 children from Kindergarten No. 44 are temporarily staying in the building of Kindergarten No. 559.

"The need to consolidate educational institutions arose after the latest massive attack by Russia on February 12, which damaged critical infrastructure facilities in the capital. Prior to this, 150 educational institution buildings were without heating; after the shelling, another 165 were added. In total, 315 buildings were left without heating — more than 30% of the city's educational institutions, including 163 kindergartens and 141 schools."

— Kyiv City State Administration (KMDA)

Consequences and challenges

Consolidation helps preserve face-to-face interaction, lesson regularity, and social stability for children. At the same time, it creates logistical burdens: the need for additional transport, schedule adjustments, increased load on receiving institutions, and stricter fire safety and sanitary requirements. The city is deploying mobile boiler units and optimizing space promptly, but long-term solutions require infrastructure restoration and additional resources.

Resumption of in-person schooling in Kyiv began on February 2, and schools determined their formats individually based on safety and conditions. The current task for city authorities is to simultaneously guarantee heat at the receiving points and minimize risks to children during transfers between institutions.

Brief conclusion: this is an example of systematic work that is not always visible in headlines but makes it possible to preserve daily life for thousands of students. Whether resources will be sufficient for a long-term solution depends on the speed of infrastructure restoration and support from partners.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026