Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Education

Ministry of Culture renames Tchaikovsky Academy: a symbolic step toward decolonization and university reform

This is not just a change of signage: the Ministry of Culture’s decision follows new laws banning Russian imperial symbolism and establishes a legal precedent for other cultural institutions. We explain precisely what was adopted and what practical consequences the new name will have.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 30, 2025 · 2 min read

Ministry of Culture renames Tchaikovsky Academy: a symbolic step toward decolonization and university reform

What happened

The Ministry of Culture of Ukraine has decided to rename the P. I. Tchaikovsky National Music Academy of Ukraine. From now on the institution will officially be called the National Music Academy of Ukraine. The decision was announced by the Ministry of Culture; the information was also published by the UNN news agency.

"We continue the process of decolonizing Ukrainian culture. The decision was made in accordance with the Law of Ukraine 'On the Condemnation and Prohibition of Propaganda of Russian Imperial Policy in Ukraine and the Decolonization of Toponymy', as well as the laws 'On Higher Education' and 'On Culture.'"

— Tetiana Berezhna, Deputy Prime Minister for Humanitarian Policy — Minister of Culture of Ukraine

Why this matters

The decision is motivated by the commission's finding that the use of Pyotr Tchaikovsky's name in the title constitutes symbolism of Russian imperial policy, which contradicts current legislation. This is a legally grounded step within the decolonization policy, combining symbolic and practical dimensions: restoring control over the cultural space and bringing institutional names into line with national policy.

What will change in practice

By order of the Ministry of Culture, the rector of the academy must, within the established timeframe, submit the Charter in its new edition and ensure the implementation of procedures related to the name change. This includes making amendments to the founding documents and the contract of the head of the institution — formal steps that will cement the institution's new identity.

"In accordance with the order, the rector of the Academy must, within the established timeframe, submit the Charter in its new edition and ensure the completion of all procedures related to the name change. Necessary amendments will also be made to the founding documents and the contract of the head of the institution."

— the Ministry of Culture said in a post

Political and legislative context

The decision comes amid a broad discussion about the decolonization of cultural toponymy and institutions. People's Deputy Zhelezniak reported that 602 amendments were submitted to the draft law on renaming; consideration in the Rada was scheduled for December 17, and the vote for January 13. This indicates intensive political work and that such changes go through a complex parliamentary process.

Brief conclusion

The academy's renaming is a logical step within the already adopted legal framework and the state's decolonization policy. Practically, this means administrative work updating statutes and documents; symbolically, it strengthens Ukraine's informational and cultural autonomy. The next question is how quickly other cultural institutions will undergo similar procedures and whether the state will provide sufficient methodological and financial support for this process.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026