Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Education

Underground school in Kyiv educating children in the spirit of the "Russian world": Lubinets demands a response from the Ministry of Education, the Prosecutor General’s Office and the SBU

Putting emotions aside — this is not an isolated incident, but a risk of ideological subversion of education and of children's safety. The ombudsman has issued inquiries following an investigative journalism probe and social media posts.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 7, 2026 · 2 min read

Underground school in Kyiv educating children in the spirit of the "Russian world": Lubinets demands a response from the Ministry of Education, the Prosecutor General’s Office and the SBU

What happened

The Verkhovna Rada Commissioner for Human Rights, Dmytro Lubinets, reported the existence of an underground school in Kyiv where children are being taught in the spirit of the "Russian world." The information was published by UNN, citing the ombudsperson's Telegram channel and a journalistic investigation.

After the discovery, Lubinets immediately sent official requests to the Ministry of Education and Science, the Office of the Prosecutor General, and the Security Service of Ukraine, demanding that they verify the facts and take appropriate measures.

"It is unacceptable that this is happening in the capital of the state, where aggression has been ongoing for 12 years, where we clearly understand the enemy's methods and insidious plans. At the same time, the protection of children is an unconditional priority of our state."

— Dmytro Lubinets, Verkhovna Rada Commissioner for Human Rights

Why it matters

Ideological preparation of children is not only a moral issue. Manipulation of children's minds has long-term consequences for social cohesion, civic security, and the strategic resilience of society. In the twelfth year of full-scale aggression, even isolated propaganda cells can become a focal point for the restoration of hostile influence.

Human rights organizations and specialists in child psychology have repeatedly stressed: early ideological indoctrination harms the development of critical thinking and undermines a child's ability to independently choose a worldview.

What authorities are already doing

According to information also confirmed by Education Minister Oksen Lisovyi, inspections have begun at institutions where children were nominally registered as students but were in fact taught in underground structures. The ombudsperson's requests have been addressed to security and law enforcement agencies, which gives reason to expect a criminal investigation if elements of a crime are found.

There are two parallel tasks: the rapid cessation of practices that harm children, and a systemic audit of student registration and curricula to prevent recurrence.

What’s next and what citizens should expect

In the coming days, one should expect the results of the Ministry of Education's inspections, the Office of the Prosecutor General's conclusions regarding grounds for initiating criminal proceedings, and possible operational actions by the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU). If the facts are confirmed — closures of underground cells, holding organizers accountable, and increased control over the student registration system are likely.

The ombudsperson's request is not only a reaction to an incident, but a test for the system: are state institutions capable of promptly and transparently protecting children and the ideological space during the war?

Question for society: will there be enough institutional resolve to turn individual investigations into systemic safeguards against ideological threats?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026