Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

CNN: Iran prefers Vance, not Witkoff or Kushner — what that means for negotiations and for Ukraine

Tehran informed Washington of its unwillingness to hold talks through Witkoff and Kushner; attention now shifts to J.D. Vance — this could change the dynamics of negotiations, affect the region’s energy sector, and open opportunities for Ukraine’s defense industry.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 25, 2026 · 2 min read

CNN: Iran prefers Vance, not Witkoff or Kushner — what that means for negotiations and for Ukraine
Стів Віткофф та Джаред Кушнер (Фото: Gian Ehrenzeller/EPA)

What happened

According to CNN, citing two unnamed sources, Iran signaled to the U.S. that talks involving special envoy Steven Witkoff and Jared Kushner in Tehran are being viewed as unproductive. The Iranians reportedly would prefer contacts with U.S. Vice President J. D. Vance.

"It gives the impression that Vance intends to end the conflict"

— an unnamed CNN source

Why it matters

The reason for the choice is not only a matter of personal preference. According to sources, Iran is orienting itself toward whoever it believes can seriously advance a ceasefire. This is a signal of a deficit of trust after the collapse of previous talks and of Tehran’s pragmatic approach to the negotiation process.

U.S. position: who is leading the dialogue?

White House spokeswoman Caroline Leavitt told CNN that the final decision on who will represent the U.S. in the talks will be made by the president. At the same time, even if Vance is more acceptable to the Iranian side, Washington still has several figures involved in the process.

"As the president said today, Vice President Vance, the Secretary of State, Special Envoy Witkoff and Mr. Kushner will participate"

— Caroline Leavitt, White House spokeswoman (CNN quote)

Regional risks and opportunities for Ukraine

Risks. Escalation in Iran threatens a spike in oil prices and logistical disruptions, which would affect Europe’s energy security and, indirectly, Ukraine. LIGA.net emphasizes that such fluctuations matter for the Ukrainian front as well — both through budgetary risks and potential changes in weapons deliveries.

Opportunities. At the same time, crises open a chance for Ukraine’s defense industry: increased demand for drones and electronic warfare systems provides an opportunity to showcase technologies developed over years of war and to seek new markets.

Brief chronological context

  • On March 23, 2026, the U.S. president announced a five-day pause in strikes on Iran, saying that the talks were "very good and productive"; Tehran denied this.
  • Earlier, Washington issued ultimatums regarding the Strait of Hormuz and threatened strikes on Iran’s energy infrastructure if demands were not met.
  • Axios reports that the U.S. proposed holding talks on March 26 and is awaiting a response from Iran.

What’s next

In the short term, the key question is whether the U.S. administration can turn the Iranians’ preference into a real format for talks. For Ukraine, it is important to monitor two parameters: energy stability and opportunities for defense exports. Diplomacy is still being conducted behind the scenes; for us, the important things are not loud statements but practical steps that will affect security and the economy.

Sources: CNN, Axios, LIGA.net.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026