Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Politics

One Officer, Two Fronts: How an Algorithm from Kharkiv Became a Template for Zaporizhzhia

# A GUR Officer with the Callsign "Toyota" Developed "Pushkoriz" Operation — Systematic Destruction of Russian Artillery in Belgorod Region, Which Stabilized Kharkiv in Fall 2024. He Later Applied the Same Logic in Zaporizhzhia.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

April 10, 2026 · 2 min read

One Officer, Two Fronts: How an Algorithm from Kharkiv Became a Template for Zaporizhzhia
Бійці (Ілюстративне фото: пресслужба ГУР)

When in September 2024, units of the unmanned systems management of the GUR Active Operations Department entered the Lipets district in the Kharkiv region, their first task was not to storm — but to observe. Reconnaissance efforts were concentrated on one objective: to identify artillery, which was then causing the greatest damage to Ukrainian infantry.

What happened next became known as "Pushkoriz" — and became not a one-time operation, but a systematic algorithm for destroying artillery systems on Russian territory. According to Liga.net, the operation from start to finish was developed by a single GUR Active Operations Department officer with the callsign Toyota.

"Pushkoriz" became one of the factors that helped stabilize the situation in the Kharkiv region in the fall of 2024, and changed approaches to countering Russian artillery in the direction.

Liga.net, according to a GUR officer

From situational strikes to a system

The fundamental shift described by Toyota is a transition from the logic of "we saw a gun, we struck" to building a cross-functional team with a flexible algorithm of action. Intelligence, unmanned systems, and strike groups began working as a single organism with clearly defined roles in advance — instead of situational coordination under fire.

This very flexibility made it possible to transfer the model to another theater. In the summer of 2025, the same officer launched "Dronicide" operation in Zaporizhzhia — and, according to the same source, it made it possible to contain Russian pressure and regain control of the airspace in the direction.

Why this matters beyond one operation

Both operations illustrate a structural deficit that the military speaks about openly: decisions that change the situation at the front often depend on one or two people who have both knowledge and access to resources simultaneously. Scaling such algorithms between directions is the real institutional problem that "Pushkoriz" has so far only indicated, but not solved.

  • Operation "Pushkoriz" — destruction of RF artillery in Belgorod region, fall 2024, Kharkiv direction
  • Operation "Dronicide" — countering Russian strike UAVs, summer 2025, Zaporizhzhia direction
  • Both developed by a GUR Active Operations Department officer with the callsign Toyota

If the algorithm is indeed being replicated between directions — the next question is not "will it work," but whether the system will have time to learn to reproduce such decisions without being tied to a specific person, while the person is still in service.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026