Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Society

Kyiv on the Line: Quirky 102 Calls as a Barometer of Police Performance and Civic Engagement

Kyiv police released a selection of unusual calls — from reports of UFOs to requests to drive away bats. These are not just amusing anecdotes: they show how the response system operates and how active the capital’s residents remain.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 1, 2026 · 2 min read

Kyiv on the Line: Quirky 102 Calls as a Barometer of Police Performance and Civic Engagement

What came in on line 102

The Main Directorate of the National Police in Kyiv, as UNN reports, published a list of atypical calls that rapid response dispatchers receive daily. Among the examples — a light dot in the sky (suspected UFO), a request to take action against a man climbing onto a roof, complaints about being unable to connect to Wi‑Fi, a call about a bat in an apartment, and others.

  • A woman reported that a man "might climb onto a star" on the roof;
  • A man could not connect to his home Wi‑Fi, although his neighbor could;
  • Suspected UFO — a light dot in the sky;
  • A complaint that opening a window triggers an air raid alarm;
  • A man who expected to buy methadone complained that "the police took the goods";
  • A young woman asked for help with a bat that flew into her apartment;
  • A Kyiv resident accused the police of seizing drugs from him;
  • A woman requested a permanent police officer to pick up a 5‑year‑old child from kindergarten.

"Every report is a living person with their own problem. Even if the situation seems strange or causes a smile — we treat each message attentively and try to help."

— Main Directorate of the National Police in Kyiv (quoted by UNN)

Why it matters

At first glance — humor, at second — a test of the system's resilience: such calls demonstrate that dispatch services are working, receiving and processing information and coordinating units. In times when security is a priority, the ability to promptly filter emergency reports from non-urgent ones largely determines the effectiveness of response.

Moreover, these calls are an indicator of civic activity. People call not only with criminal reports but also with everyday problems, which indicates trust in the system: they expect a response from public services.

Context and consequences

According to police data, on the night of December 31 to January 1 no serious public order violations were recorded. This is an important fact: even during the holiday period the capital's services maintained order, and atypical calls did not divert resources from real threats.

Conclusion

Quirky calls are not just anecdotes for the news feed. They show how the security infrastructure works and how active the community is. The state must maintain a balance: improve responsiveness while also explaining to citizens how to properly use line 102 so that emergency calls are not lost among everyday problems.

Question for discussion: is enough attention being paid to preventive communication to reduce the number of non-emergency calls and focus resources on priority cases?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026