Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Society

Attempt to discredit Jerry Heil in the national selection: the truth about charity and the consequences

Allegations have appeared online that Jerry Heil was indifferent to fundraisers for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. This is not merely a reputational matter — it concerns the standards of the national selection and public trust in artists who work with volunteer initiatives.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 20, 2026 · 2 min read

Attempt to discredit Jerry Heil in the national selection: the truth about charity and the consequences

What happened

According to UNN, singer Jerry Heil reported in Instagram Stories attempts to remove her from the National selection for "Eurovision 2026" over alleged "falling reach" and the spread of false information about her attitude toward fundraising for the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

The artist insists these accusations are not true: her brother serves in the Armed Forces, she regularly donates to his fundraiser and urges her followers to join, and she has taken part in several well-known charitable initiatives.

"Information has come in that they simply want to take me out of the national selection and will now spread lies that I supposedly don't support fundraisers because 'reach is falling'. Don't fall for it, because my brother is a serviceman. For example, here is a current fundraiser he asked to share, to which I will donate myself, and we periodically run fundraisers with you."

— Jerry Heil, singer (Instagram Stories; quote via UNN)

What confirms the charitable activity

Publicly available facts support the artist: during Eurovision 2024 Jerry Heil together with alyona alyona raised funds to rebuild a gymnasium destroyed by the occupiers — in total over 10 million UAH. In public statements she has also noted participation in fundraisers for casevac kits, drones and turrets, as well as campaigns to return Ukrainian children abducted by Russia.

Why it matters

This is not just a story about one artist. The discrediting of public figures undermines trust in volunteer initiatives and creates a dangerous precedent for the selection process of a song contest that should be open and transparent. Media experts warn that such information attacks often begin on social media and are spread by those interested in changing voting outcomes or creating public resonance.

What to do next

Organizers of the National selection should adhere to transparent rules and respond promptly to such complaints — not emotionally, but with facts. The public should check sources and avoid sharing unverified posts, since this undermines support for the front and trust in cultural institutions.

In short: this is not only about Jerry Heil's reputation, but about how we protect values and institutions during the war — and who we allow onto the national stage.

Conclusion

This case shows how quickly disinformation can affect careers and public support. Instead of panic — simple questions: is there evidence for the accusations, are the selection organizers acting transparently, and are we ready to defend standards when what’s at stake is not only a contest but the reputation of those who support the country.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026