Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

World

Britain considers banning crypto donations to political parties — Farage’s party could be in the crosshairs

The UK government is examining the possibility of banning the financing of political parties with cryptocurrency. The restriction could hit Nigel Farage’s Reform UK hardest — the first party to officially accept such donations.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 2, 2025 · 2 min read

Britain considers banning crypto donations to political parties — Farage’s party could be in the crosshairs
Фарадж, який володіє деякими довгостроковими криптоактивами, заявив сектору, що він є «єдиною надією» для британського криптобізнесу. | Ден Кітвуд/Getty Images

Government is considering a ban on crypto donations

The British government is considering banning the use of cryptocurrencies to fund political parties. This decision could directly affect Nigel Farage’s Reform UK — the first party in the UK to start accepting political donations in cryptocurrency this year.

Reform UK became the first political force to accept crypto donations

Farage’s party launched its own portal for cryptocurrency donations and said it had “enhanced” control mechanisms to prevent abuse. In October Farage confirmed to Reuters that Reform UK had already received several such donations.

Farage himself, who holds his own long-term crypto assets, positions himself as the “only hope” of the British crypto industry, seeking to follow Donald Trump’s stance on digital currencies.

Government under pressure over a ban

Although the initial draft bill did not include provisions banning crypto donations, the government — which is trailing Reform UK significantly in the polls — is now under pressure to introduce such restrictions.

The idea of a ban has previously been supported by former Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden, business committee chair Liam Byrne and MP Phil Brickell, who chairs the cross-party group on anti-corruption and fair taxation.

Why crypto donations are causing concern

Experts on transparency of funding warn that the origin of crypto transfers is difficult to trace. This creates a risk of:

  • foreign interference in UK politics;
  • the use of funds obtained through criminal activity;
  • breaching laws that effectively prohibit political donations from abroad.

The government also plans to add provisions that will change the rules on party funding — including limits for shell companies and unincorporated associations. Parties may be required to carry out mandatory risk assessments regarding foreign influence.

Context: cryptocurrencies as a tool of interference

Intelligence agencies say Russia is increasingly using digital assets to evade sanctions and fund destabilisation operations — including in Moldova’s elections.

Debate intensified after the conviction of Nathan Gill — the former leader of Reform in Wales and a former Member of the European Parliament for Farage’s party. He was sentenced to more than 10 years for accepting money to promote pro‑Russian messages in the European Parliament.

Farage distanced himself from the case, calling Gill “a bad apple.” Meanwhile, Prime Minister Keir Starmer urged Farage to conduct an internal investigation.

Government promises to "protect democracy"

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said the current system of political funding has left democracy vulnerable to foreign influence.

“Our new tough rules on political donations, set out in the Elections Strategy, will protect British elections while also allowing parties to continue funding their activities,”

– the government said.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026