Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

17% of Ukraine’s IT specialists have mobilization exemptions — what it means for the labor market and security

Over six months the share of booked IT specialists rose from 13% to 17% — a signal for employers, the state and the specialists themselves. We break down who is prioritized, how salaries have changed, and what the consequences are for mobility and business.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 11, 2026 · 2 min read

17% of Ukraine’s IT specialists have mobilization exemptions — what it means for the labor market and security
Ілюстративне фото: Depositphotos

DOU data: reservations rise to 17%

"The share of IT specialists in Ukraine who have employer reservations has risen to 17%."

— DOU, salary survey (n=7,187 respondents, located in Ukraine)

This is a key labor‑market indicator in wartime: over six months the figure climbed from 13% to 17%, while the share of those without reservations fell from 44% to 39%. Another 5% of respondents have a reservation or a deferment at a second job, and 14% have a deferment for other reasons. A separate group — 21% — are not subject to mobilization due to age, health status, or already completed service.

Who is prioritized

Reservations are most often granted to managers and senior technical specialists: among managers — 34%, among lead engineers — 31%. High levels of reservations are also seen among analysts, support specialists, system administrators and DevOps engineers. This indicates that employers are focusing on roles that ensure continuity of services and critical infrastructure.

Economic side: salaries and the market

The salary of IT professionals with reservations today is about $3,500. That is $433 less than six months ago, but still above the industry average (~$3,000). Thus, although the gap between reserved positions and the market is narrowing, reservations remain a tool for retaining key personnel.

Why this matters — a brief analysis

1) For security: reservations concentrate personnel in roles critical to the state and business, reducing the risk of service disruption during mobilization. 2) For companies: it is a balance between their duty to the state and the need to retain competencies. 3) For the specialists themselves: reservations provide some protection, but do not guarantee stable compensation — salaries of those with reservations have declined, and this is an important signal for HR strategies.

What to watch next

If the trend of growing reservations continues, it will affect the labor market: competition will intensify for technical staff without reservations, wages may further level out, and there will be pressure on legislation regarding reservation criteria. The state and companies need to coordinate priorities so that reservations function as a tool of national security, not merely as an employment perk.

Summary: DOU figures are not just statistics but an indicator of how the war is shaping working practices in IT. For employers, it's a signal to review retention policies and transparency of criteria. For the state, it's a reason to systematize approaches to reservations so they truly strengthen defensive and economic potential.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026