Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

48 Billion Hours in AI: How Generative Intelligence Is Transforming the Mobile Market and What It Means for Ukraine

Users spent 48 billion hours in AI apps, and mobile spending reached $85 billion — growth that is changing the rules of the game. We explain why this matters for the economy, security, and Ukrainian developers.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 21, 2026 · 2 min read

48 Billion Hours in AI: How Generative Intelligence Is Transforming the Mobile Market and What It Means for Ukraine

The Big Picture

In 2025 user spending on mobile apps reached $85 billion, 21% more than in 2024, and surpassed spending on games. The growth is almost entirely linked to the spread of generative AI: users spent 48 billion hours in AI apps — 3.6 times more than the year before. These figures are reported by Sensor Tower.

“Generative capabilities have become the main driver of spending and time spent in the mobile ecosystem.”

— Sensor Tower

Key facts to remember

The most profitable app in the category was ChatGPT — it earned about $3.4 billion over the year. The total number of launches of AI apps exceeded 1 trillion, and launch rates grew faster than downloads themselves. The share of products from Google, Microsoft and X rose from 14% to nearly 30% due to the addition of text, code, image and video generation features.

At the same time, almost half of all downloads went to OpenAI and DeepSeek. In the US, more than 200 million people used AI assistants, of whom 110 million used them on smartphones. Parallel to this, OpenAI announced an age-verification system for accounts, and a new ChatGPT Go plan appeared in Ukraine.

What this means for the market and for Ukraine

This is not just a technical breakthrough — it is a redistribution of value in the digital economy. On one hand, market concentration among large players increases the risk of platform dependence and reduces room for small developers. On the other hand, the wave of demand creates opportunities for Ukrainian companies and specialists: from integrating local data to creating niche services (language, content, security).

For the state, this is a signal to work on three directions simultaneously: support innovation and investment in startups, strengthen rules on digital sovereignty and data protection, and invest in education — to retain and multiply talent in Ukraine.

Risks and imperatives

Rapid growth also brings risks: privacy, content moderation, generation errors (hallucinations) and dependence on external APIs. Therefore it is important to combine market initiative with regulatory standards — otherwise the economic benefits may prove short-lived.

Practical steps analysts propose: stimulate local solutions through grants and tax incentives, require transparency in model operation for critical services, and develop tools for age and content control.

Conclusion

48 billion hours of use and $85 billion in spending are markers that the mobile market is entering a new phase driven by generative AI. For Ukraine this is a chance: we have the engineering workforce and an IT ecosystem to turn growth into sustainability and security. The question is whether the state and industry will manage to convert these opportunities into concrete projects and rules of the game in time.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026