Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

48% of Ukrainians Prefer Chats and Video Calls: How It’s Changing Communication with Loved Ones Abroad

Messaging apps are no longer just a convenience — nearly half of Ukrainians communicate with relatives abroad via chats and video calls. We examine why this matters for security, assistance, and the services that cater to the diaspora.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 19, 2026 · 2 min read

48% of Ukrainians Prefer Chats and Video Calls: How It’s Changing Communication with Loved Ones Abroad
Ілюстративне фото: Rakuten Viber

In brief

According to a Rakuten Viber survey cited by LIGA.net, 48% of Ukrainians contact relatives and friends abroad via chats and video calls. This is not just a number — it signals a shift in communication patterns with practical implications for security, aid coordination and business services.

What the survey showed

The distribution of communication channels looks like this: 48% — chats and video calls, 11% — phone calls, 8% — rare contacts, 6% — social networks, and 5% — do not communicate at all. Another 22% of respondents reported that they do not have close relatives abroad. The survey also recorded changes in social circles: the majority experienced a reduction, 24% — no change, 17% — have made new acquaintances.

Why people choose messengers

There are several logical reasons: first, messengers save on communication costs and perform better under unstable coverage. Second, they offer asynchrony — important when the interlocutor is in a different time zone. Third, modern features (file sharing, group chats, video calls, built-in translation) make messengers a universal tool for emotional support, volunteer coordination and business communication.

"Messengers have become the main channel of communication with relatives and friends abroad"

— The Rakuten Viber team

Technical innovations are driving the trend

Viber not only notes the changes but also rolls out tools that strengthen them: AI for editing and translating messages and a marketplace for finding services. This reduces language barriers and increases the platform’s usefulness for those supporting relatives or conducting business from abroad.

Consequences — for the state, businesses and volunteers

The dominance of messengers means: state services and volunteer networks should invest in official channels within messengers, ensure the security and accessibility of information, and businesses should adapt services (translation, customer support, marketplaces) to these platforms. For every family, it’s a faster and cheaper way to stay in touch — a reality that matters during a crisis.

Conclusion

The survey results are not just another statistic. The predominance of chats and video calls is changing the logic of communication with the diaspora and requires appropriate solutions in the areas of security, social support and business services. Now the question is for partners: will they turn these digital connections into reliable services for Ukrainians — at home and abroad?

Data: Rakuten Viber, information — LIGA.net

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026