Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

590,000 buyers paid $59 million for a smartphone that may not exist

Trump Mobile has quietly changed the terms of its T1 Phone pre-order: a $100 deposit no longer guarantees either the phone's manufacture or its sale. Almost a year has passed with no confirmed shipments.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 11, 2026 · 3 min read

590,000 buyers paid $59 million for a smartphone that may not exist
T1 Phone (Фото: Trump Mobile)

June 16, 2025, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump presented the T1 Phone at Trump Tower — a "patriotic alternative to Apple and Samsung" for $499. To reserve, buyers deposited $100, with delivery promised for the following summer. Eleven months later, there are no confirmed shipments.

What Changed on April 6

An update to the pre-order terms published on April 6 contains a key provision: the deposit "provides only conditional opportunity, if Trump Mobile later decides at its sole discretion to offer the device for sale." The company also stated that it does not guarantee commercial release of the T1 Phone or even the beginning of its production.

"Pre-orders are not purchases, are not acceptances of orders, do not create a contract of sale and do not transfer ownership."

Trump Mobile, updated pre-order terms, April 6, 2026

Before this update, buyers could reasonably believe they were paying for a reservation of a real product. Now, legally — they are not.

$59 Million in Limbo

Approximately 590,000 buyers deposited a combined $59 million. For comparison: this is more than the annual budget of some mid-sized Ukrainian cities.

NBC News, which itself deposited in August 2025 for journalistic monitoring, called customer service five times between September and November. Company representatives consistently promised delivery on November 13, then in December, then "sometime in the first quarter of 2026" — citing a federal government pause that cannot affect private companies.

Journalist Joseph Cox from 404 Media also attempted to make a deposit — Trump Mobile charged his card an incorrect amount and never once asked for a delivery address.

Technical Status of the Project

At a presentation in February 2026, Trump Mobile executives Don Hendrickson and Eric Thomas showed a new prototype and announced specifications: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7-series chipset, 5000 mAh battery, 512 GB storage. They reported that the device passed FCC certification, but as of May 2026 has not yet received certification from T-Mobile — the carrier through whose network it is supposed to operate.

Simultaneously, the company announced the T1 Ultra model — but provided neither timelines nor terms.

Regulatory Pressure

In January 2026, Senator Elizabeth Warren, along with nine other members of Congress, addressed the Federal Trade Commission with a demand to investigate a "scheme of potentially deceptive practices" — including advertising claims about American manufacturing and deposits for a product that does not exist.

The FTC under Trump administration is unlikely to expedite an investigation — but the mere fact of the official complaint creates a legal precedent for future lawsuits by buyers.

Why This Is Not Just a Curiosity

The scheme "collect deposits → change terms → keep the money" is known in consumer law as constructive fraud even without malicious intent. The key question is not whether the T1 Phone will be released — but whether 590,000 people will be able to recover their money if the company announces a "project closure" in accordance with those same new terms, which clearly permit it.

If by the end of 2026 the FTC does not open an official investigation and T-Mobile does not provide certification — the chances of seeing the T1 Phone for sale approach zero, and the only practical question becomes legal: whether the $59 million in deposits will be considered company income or an obligation to buyers.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026