Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

Apple Fixes Liquid Glass — But the Real Reason Isn't About Aesthetics

macOS 27 fixes interface that Apple itself broke a year ago. Complaints about transparency lead to preparations for touchscreen MacBooks and transition to Apple Silicon only.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 11, 2026 · 3 min read

Apple Fixes Liquid Glass — But the Real Reason Isn't About Aesthetics
Ілюстративне фото: Depositphotos

When a company spends years building a reputation for flawless design, and then is forced to publicly fix its own interface a year after release — that's no longer an "iteration." That's an admission of a mistake. This is exactly what's happening with Liquid Glass in macOS 27.

What specifically is broken and what's being patched

According to Mark Gurman from Bloomberg, Apple internally describes the changes as "a light redesign" — fixing shadows, transparency, and contrast of elements that proved problematic for readability in macOS Tahoe. The criticism came not just from ordinary users: designers and developers complained about accessibility issues — the interface is difficult to perceive in bright conditions or for people with vision impairments.

As MacRumors reports, there's also a technical reason why Liquid Glass looks worse than intended: most Macs still use LCD displays, which don't reproduce glass and transparency effects as effectively as OLED screens. In other words, Apple developed an interface for hardware it hasn't sold yet.

Safari and AI: convenience or illusion of control

In parallel, a new Safari feature is being tested — automatic tab grouping using AI. The system will independently sort open tabs into categories without user intervention. The feature is based on existing Tab Groups, but delegates organization to Apple Intelligence.

"I don't want AI rearranging my tabs"

— typical reaction in MacRumors threads after the feature announcement

This is a fundamental contradiction in Apple's approach: the company positions automation as convenience, but part of its audience perceives it as a loss of control over their own workspace. The feature will also be available in iOS 27 and iPadOS 27.

Snow Leopard 2026 — and the end of Intel

Alongside the design, macOS 27 will have a "Snow Leopard" focus: according to MacRumors, Apple is concentrating on stability, performance, and bug fixes — without major architectural innovations. The analogy with Mac OS X Snow Leopard from 2009 is apt here: after the ambitious Leopard, the company took a year to "clean the pipes."

But there's a significant difference from 2009: macOS 27 will be the first version that no longer supports Intel Macs. After Apple announced that macOS Tahoe was the last for Intel, the next release will work exclusively on Apple Silicon (M1 and newer). For corporate clients where video production teams still use Intel applications without ARM equivalents — this is not an abstract warning, but a real deadline.

The real context: preparing for touchscreen Mac

The least discussed in the leaks — the most important. As Gurman reports, Apple is simultaneously testing in macOS 27 interface optimizations for touchscreen displays — in connection with an expected MacBook Pro or MacBook Ultra with a touchscreen, planned for early 2027. These changes will likely be hidden in public beta versions and appear only with the new hardware.

Then the Liquid Glass fix takes on a different meaning: Apple isn't just responding to complaints — it's adapting the interface for OLED screens and touch input that don't yet exist for sale. The current "patches" are platform preparation, not an admission of defeat.

If a MacBook with a touchscreen launches by March 2027 and gets an OLED panel, it will become clear whether Liquid Glass was a premature decision for future hardware — or just a rushed redesign that needed to be salvaged retroactively.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026