Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

Why Meta Quest Got More Expensive Due to Artificial Intelligence — And This Is Just the Beginning

# AI-Driven Memory Shortage Hits Meta VR Headsets, Threatens Samsung, Microsoft, Sony A shortage of RAM caused by the AI data center race has impacted Meta's VR headsets and is now affecting Samsung, Microsoft, and Sony. Consumer electronics prices are expected to continue rising through at least 2026.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

April 17, 2026 · 2 min read

Why Meta Quest Got More Expensive Due to Artificial Intelligence — And This Is Just the Beginning
Meta Quest 3 (Фото: Meta)

Starting April 19, Meta Quest 3 costs $600 instead of $500, Quest 3S — from $350 instead of $300. Official explanation: memory chip shortage. But behind this brief statement lies a structural change in the entire semiconductor market.

How AI "Stole" Memory from Your VR Headset

DRAM manufacturers — Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron, which together control over 70% of the global market — have redirected capacity toward high-margin HBM memory for GPU servers. According to IEEE Spectrum, the share of cloud and AI memory in Micron's revenue grew from 17% in 2023 to nearly 50% in 2025. Consumer electronics got what was left.

The result — prices for standard DRAM rose 50% in just one quarter-on-quarter comparison, and TrendForce analysts forecast another 40% increase in the next quarter. As NPR reports citing TrendForce, if manufacturers want chips faster — they pay two to three times the normal price.

"AI has changed the very nature of demand"

Sanchit Vir Gogia, CEO Greyhound Research

Meta — Not First, Not Last

According to TechCrunch, Meta joined Samsung, Microsoft, and Sony, which have already raised prices on their hardware for the same reason. IDC forecasts that pressure on smartphone and PC manufacturers will persist at least until 2027, and Lenovo, Dell, HP, Acer, and ASUS have warned customers about price increases of 15–20%.

For Meta, the situation is complicated separately: the Reality Labs division has lost over $80 billion since 2020, including $19 billion in 2025 alone. Rising component costs compound a chronically unprofitable business — and pricing pressure is passed directly to consumers without a profitability buffer.

Notably, the price increase applies not only to new devices but also to refurbished ones — this indicates that costs are embedded deeply in the supply chain rather than representing a situational reaction to a single batch of components.

What's Next

New DRAM production capacity won't appear quickly: according to IEEE Spectrum's estimates, even factories currently under construction are unlikely to significantly reduce prices before 2028. Micron CEO Sanjay Mehrotra told analysts directly that demand will "substantially exceed supply in the foreseeable future."

If Meta releases Quest 4 in 2026 amid continued memory price increases — will the company be able to keep it in the affordable segment, or will VR headsets finally become a niche premium product?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026