Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

Drone Without a Pilot: Dutch Startup Taught "Vovkulaka" to Intercept "Shaheds" Without GPS and Without AI

The Fiducial Defense auto-guidance system, integrated into the Ukrainian interceptor drone "Volkulaka," does not use neural networks — and this is precisely what makes it suitable for real combat conditions where GPS and analog signals are jammed.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 13, 2026 · 2 min read

Drone Without a Pilot: Dutch Startup Taught "Vovkulaka" to Intercept "Shaheds" Without GPS and Without AI
Ілюстративне фото: Depositphotos

Intercepting a "Shaheed" flying at a speed of 200 km/h while looking at a grainy analog image — this is the task that Ukrainian drone interceptor operators face every night. Dutch startup Fiducial Defense from Delft was solving exactly this problem when it suddenly changed its profile from industrial 3D positioning to defense software in June 2024.

What was tested and where

As part of the Test in Ukraine program implemented by Brave1, the company tested an automatic target guidance system integrated into the Ukrainian interceptor drone "Vovkulaka". According to Brave1, during the tests, the system demonstrated stable detection, tracking, and autonomous interception of aerial targets.

This is not a UFO. An automatic target guidance system by Fiducial Defense has just locked onto an aerial target.

Brave1, Twitter/X, May 12, 2025

Company CEO Andreas Verbruggen had visited Ukraine five times at that point — working directly with units and drone manufacturers. According to him, qualified operators have become "one of the biggest bottlenecks" in the war.

Unexpected choice: without AI

The key difference from most competitors — the system does not use artificial intelligence models. As Verbruggen explains, this is a deliberate engineering decision:

  • If an enemy drone changes shape or speed — nothing needs to be retrained.
  • The system works the same way day and night "out of the box".
  • It runs on cheap hardware — Jetson, Orange Pi and their analogues — which is critical in conditions of unstable supply chains.

Instead, it uses computer vision and its own terminal guidance algorithm: the target is detected, tracked, and the platform autonomously moves to the interception point. In several test launches that Verbruggen showed publicly, the autonomous system reached the interception point faster than a human pilot could react.

Humans remain in the loop for now

Despite being technically ready for full autonomy, the operator is present in the system — for now as a conscious company choice, not as a technical limitation. In parallel, Fiducial is developing navigation under GPS jamming conditions: the drone navigates purely by side camera, without satellite signal.

The Test in Ukraine program has already received applications from 45 foreign companies since its launch — Fiducial became one of the first to complete a full cycle of field tests and receive integration into a serial platform.

The real question now is not technical: if the system already intercepts faster than a human and doesn't require retraining — how much longer will the operator remain in the loop in practice, rather than just on paper in company documents?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026