Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

Two Out of Several Dozen: How Ukraine Launches Gambling Market Monitoring Without Enforcement Mechanism

The DSOM is the first system that provides the state with data on gambling business transactions in real time. However, only two companies have connected to it so far, while the rest of the licensees have six months to do so — with no clearly defined penalties for delays.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

April 10, 2026 · 2 min read

Two Out of Several Dozen: How Ukraine Launches Gambling Market Monitoring Without Enforcement Mechanism
Фото: Depositphotos

Native Apps and "Slots Uey" became the first companies to connect to the State System for Online Monitoring of Gambling Business (DSOM). Liga.net was informed about this by a government source. Against the backdrop of several dozen licensed market operators, this is still a symbolic start.

What the state sees after connection

Before the launch of DSOM, the regulator received market data retroactively in the form of reports for previous periods. This made it impossible to respond promptly to violations. Now each bet, payout, or refund is transmitted to the system as a separate transaction with a unique identifier — 24/7, without delays.

The first phase of DSOM is the financial core: the state sees bet acceptance, winnings payouts, and refunds to players. This is sufficient for controlling cash flows, but the system currently does not cover the internal mechanics of games.

"Right now we are in the final stages of seeking financing, because unfortunately the state budget did not allocate funds for this critically important system"

Head of PlayCity (State Agency for Gambling)

The second phase — analytics, control of gaming machine operations, compliance with responsible gambling principles, and accounting of gaming money substitutes — is expected in autumn 2026. Its estimated cost: 45 million hryvnia, but this figure may change due to exchange rates and market conditions.

Six months — and what next

All licensed operators have been given six months to connect to DSOM. The enforcement mechanism for ignoring this deadline has not been publicly detailed: PlayCity speaks of "gradual coverage of the entire licensed market" without clarifying what consequences non-compliance will entail.

  • First phase — transactional monitoring (bets, payouts, refunds). Already in test operation.
  • Second phase — advanced analytics and control of the gaming process. Tender in the near future, financing outside the state budget.
  • Market connection deadline — 6 months from the start of industrial operation.

The practical value of DSOM directly depends on the completeness of its coverage: a system connected to two operators out of several dozen gives the state not a picture of the market, but a fragment of it. The real test will occur not now, but in six months — when it becomes clear how many companies connected voluntarily and how many had to be nudged.

If the regulator does not publish a list of those who missed the deadline and does not apply specific measures, the question about DSOM's real function will remain open: is it a control tool or voluntary reporting in a new format.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026