Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

Dynamic Island on the left: how the iPhone 18 Pro could reshape the interface and the market

Insider Jon Prosser claims that the Dynamic Island on the iPhone 18 Pro will move to the upper-left corner. This is not just a design change — questions of app and accessory compatibility and biometric security also affect the Ukrainian market. We examine why it’s worth paying attention.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 19, 2026 · 2 min read

Dynamic Island on the left: how the iPhone 18 Pro could reshape the interface and the market

What the insider said

Blogger Jon Prosser said in a video that in the iPhone 18 Pro the Dynamic Island area will no longer be positioned in the center of the display. According to him, Apple allegedly plans to integrate the Face ID system under the screen and move the front camera to a separate hole in the upper left corner — that is where the Dynamic Island is expected to emerge from.

"The Dynamic Island will no longer be centered on the display; it will appear from the upper left corner, dynamically expanding across the top of the screen."

— Jon Prosser, blogger/insider

Why it matters

At first glance — it's a cosmetic change. But for users and the market the consequences are practical and far-reaching. Moving the Dynamic Island and integrating Face ID under the screen will affect the placement of interface elements, notification behavior, and the visual logic of apps. Developers will have to adapt UIs; manufacturers of screen protectors, cases, and service centers will need to reassess product form factors and repair processes.

From a security standpoint, under-screen biometrics have technical nuances: to maintain accuracy and protect data, Apple will need additional engineering solutions. This matters for government services and for companies that rely on biometrics in their apps.

How plausible it is

The information comes from a single well-known insider. It's worth remembering the context: in 2025 Apple sued Prosser over alleged leaks of iOS 26, so some of his claims should be critically evaluated. Technically and logistically such a move has grounds — the display industry is developing under-screen sensors, and Apple regularly tests new components to achieve a larger screen without notches.

The iPhone 18 Pro announcement is expected in September 2026. In addition, there are rumors online about a foldable iPhone and a change to launch timing (base models iPhone 18 and iPhone 18e might reportedly be released in spring). Until official confirmation, all of this should be treated as possible scenarios rather than facts.

What users and the market in Ukraine should do

Don't rush to conclusions or purchases — but start preparing. Mobile app developers should check UI adaptability for different notch placements; accessories sellers and service centers should analyze potential changes in demand and construction details. Ukrainian users will benefit from a larger usable screen area, but may face updates to peripherals or short-term compatibility issues.

Brief conclusion: Prosser's claim is a signal worth attention: if the changes materialize, they will affect not only design but the ecosystem around the smartphone. Watching for confirmations is wiser than making extreme predictions.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026