Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

Google is building an almost 'waterless' data center in Texas — a $40 billion investment and its consequences for energy and water

Google announced another major data center in Texas featuring air cooling as part of a $40 billion investment. It reduces the water footprint but raises questions about grid stress, prices and regulation — important not only for the United States, but also as a lesson for Ukraine.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 25, 2026 · 2 min read

Google is building an almost 'waterless' data center in Texas — a $40 billion investment and its consequences for energy and water
Дата-центр (Фото: Depositphotos)

What was announced

Google has confirmed the construction of a new data center in Texas that will use an "advanced air‑cooling technology" aimed at minimizing fresh water consumption. According to the company, water will be used only for the campus’s critical needs, such as kitchens, and not for the primary server cooling systems.

The project is part of a two‑year investment program worth $40 billion in the state. As part of this strategy, Google also reports contracts with energy providers that would add about 7,800 MW of new clean capacity to Texas’s power system.

Why it matters

The technical shift—from water cooling to efficient air‑based solutions—reduces the risk of depleting local water resources, especially in regions subject to periodic drought. At the same time, large data centers are major electricity consumers; adding thousands of megawatts has a direct impact on the supply‑and‑demand balance and on prices for end consumers.

For Ukraine this is an important signal: digital infrastructure during wartime and reconstruction must be planned with resource resilience in mind—energy and water—and coordinated with the development of renewables and transmission infrastructure.

Opposition and risks

The announcement came against the backdrop of growing resistance from local communities to large data centers. Critics fear higher electricity tariffs, increased greenhouse gas emissions (if new generation is not sufficiently clean), and potential environmental problems related to water quality near the infrastructure.

In the past, projects by hyperscale companies have sparked local scandals and questions about water quality control—cases of elevated nitrate concentrations and other incidents have led communities to demand transparent environmental assessments and monitoring.

"Water will be used only for the campus’s critical needs, such as kitchens, and not for server cooling systems"

— Google press office

Lessons for Ukraine

1) The digital economy’s infrastructure must be built with resource security in mind: energy + water + reserves. 2) Contracts for additional capacity should include guarantees of clean generation to avoid local spikes in emissions and price increases. 3) Transparent environmental monitoring and community engagement are key to maintaining a social license to operate for large facilities.

Now the question for partners and regulators: will large investments in digital infrastructure become a source of sustainable development and energy resilience, or an additional burden on local communities? The answer depends not only on the technologies but on the rules of the game and on enforcement.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026