Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

Google allows importing chats from ChatGPT and Claude into Gemini — what it means for Ukrainians

Google has introduced tools to import "memories" and chat history into Gemini — making it easier to switch between bots, but raising new questions about privacy and data control.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 27, 2026 · 2 min read

Google allows importing chats from ChatGPT and Claude into Gemini — what it means for Ukrainians
Ілюстративне фото: Depositphotos

Briefly

Google announced new tools that allow transferring personal data and chat history from other AI services into its chatbot Gemini. Export support already exists in services such as ChatGPT and Claude; the import itself can be done through special prompts or by uploading a ZIP archive with chats. The company says that after the import Gemini will be able to "understand the key facts" that the user told other services and continue the interaction without losing context.

"understand the key facts"

— Google (product announcement)

How it works

The transfer involves two main options: step‑by‑step copying of responses (via prompts in the old chatbot and pasting into Gemini) or bulk importing history as a ZIP file. After uploading, Gemini indexes the chats and allows searching through the uploaded dialogues — this saves the user's time and preserves established interaction settings.

Why this matters for Ukraine

The combination of convenience and the prospect of localization has several practical implications. First, it lowers the barrier to switching between services — this is useful for journalists, volunteers, and organizations that need continuity of context (language preferences, local topics). Second, it strengthens competition in the AI market: the ability to import makes platform choice more pragmatic and less tied to a single provider.

It is also important that Google services such as Live in Search and the Ask Maps feature in Google Maps have recently appeared in Ukraine — importing context makes these tools more useful specifically for local planning tasks and timely information searches.

Risks and practical advice

Transferring data increases convenience but at the same time concentrates information, which creates privacy risks. Chat archives may contain personal data, financial or medical information — their bulk import into a single service raises the potential harm in case of a leak.

Recommendations for users:

• before exporting, review and remove any unnecessary or sensitive information;

• keep backups and check how the platform processes imported data;

• use encryption for local archives and read the privacy policy carefully — issues of portability and control over data echo European approaches (GDPR).

Summary

Import tools for Gemini provide a real benefit: less routine when switching between bots and better preservation of context. However, the next move is up to users and regulators: can services guarantee the security and transparency of processing imported data? This is a key question for Ukrainian users who value convenience without losing criticality regarding privacy and digital sovereignty.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026