Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

"Hail" with Cages: Armed Forces Learn to Protect MLRS from FPV Drones the Same Way as Tanks

# Translation The 50th Separate Artillery Brigade showcased "Grads" with grilles over launch guides, mesh structures on the cabin, and electronic warfare domes. In parallel, the National Guard went further — completely transferred the system to a MAN chassis with digital fire control.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 21, 2026 · 2 min read

"Hail" with Cages: Armed Forces Learn to Protect MLRS from FPV Drones the Same Way as Tanks
РСЗВ БМ-21 "Град" (Фото: 60-та ОАБр)

In photographs released by the press service of the 50th Separate Artillery Brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine during training exercises, several types of anti-drone protection can be seen on the BM-21 "Grad" MLRS simultaneously: metal grilles above the launch guides, mesh structures in front of the cabin, and domes of electronic warfare equipment. Additionally, there are grilles on the doors to protect the crew. This same logic of layered protection previously appeared on tanks and armored personnel carriers — now it has been transferred to rocket artillery.

Why "Grad" is a Special Target

The BM-21 operates at distances from 5 to 40 km, however the brigade chooses firing positions much closer to the line of contact than heavy artillery. This is precisely what makes the installations vulnerable to attack FPV drones with a range of 10–15 km: the vehicle has time to leave the position after firing, but the window of vulnerability during deployment and withdrawal remains. Grilles do not stop a drone on a fiber-optic cable — against which electronic warfare is powerless — but significantly reduce the effectiveness of standard FPV drones with cumulative warheads, forcing the charge to detonate before contact with the cabin armor.

What Changed — and What Was Not Mentioned

The official statement from the brigade notes "improvements in firing accuracy and effectiveness," but without technical details — standard practice for operational security. At the same time, a parallel modernization direction being developed by the National Guard of Ukraine provides more details. As reported by the commander of the National Guard of Ukraine, Brigadier General Oleksandr Pivnenko, their version received a MAN 6×6 chassis instead of the Soviet "Ural," electric drives for guidance systems, and a digital fire control complex.

"New digital complexes allow for significantly more accurate and timely target detection, coordinate calculation, and opening fire"

Commander of the National Guard of Ukraine Oleksandr Pivnenko

In addition, electronic warfare equipment was installed on the National Guard machine and the ammunition capacity was increased to improve autonomy — without the need for a separate transport-loading vehicle alongside it.

Two Approaches to One Problem

In fact, the Ukrainian defense industry is pursuing two parallel concepts:

  • Field adaptation — grilles, electronic warfare domes, nets that are mounted on existing vehicles in the combat zone or near the front line. Fast, mass-produced, without factory conditions.
  • Deep modernization — replacement of the chassis with a MAN, digital control, electric drives. Requires a factory base, but provides a qualitative leap in mobility and accuracy.

According to Defence Express, the number of available BM-21s in Ukraine suitable for conversion is not disclosed for security reasons — but the potential scope of the program is significant, given that the "Grad" has been the foundation of Soviet and post-Soviet rocket artillery for decades.

Anti-drone nets are not a guarantee of survival — they change probabilities. Drones on fiber-optic cables, which no electronic warfare can jam, are already being recorded on the front, and field cages are also ineffective against them. The question is whether the pace of deep modernization — with new chassis and digital control — will catch up with the pace of appearance of drones capable of bypassing any passive defense.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026