Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

iPhone 17 — the best-selling smartphone of the quarter. But the real victory isn't in the numbers

Apple has occupied three of the top ten positions by sales volume and nearly half of the global smartphone revenue. These are different rankings—and different signals for the market.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

May 11, 2026 · 2 min read

iPhone 17 — the best-selling smartphone of the quarter. But the real victory isn't in the numbers
iPhone 17 (Фото: Apple)

In the first quarter of 2026, iPhone 17 captured 6% of global smartphone sales — the largest share of any individual model, according to Counterpoint Research data. The iPhone 17 Pro Max and iPhone 17 Pro took second and third positions respectively. Last year's iPhone 16 held onto sixth place — a rare case where the predecessor doesn't disappear from the charts after its successor's launch.

Units vs. Revenue: Where Apple Truly Dominates

The unit-based ranking tells one story. Revenue tells another, and a more telling one. Nearly half of all money spent on smartphones worldwide in Q1 2026 went to Apple — a 22% year-over-year increase, according to PhoneArena citing market analysts. Samsung also grew by 4%, but the gap between the companies in average selling price remains a chasm.

This explains the paradox: Samsung is present in five of the top ten models by volume — primarily thanks to the Galaxy A series, that is, budget devices. Apple occupies three positions with the premium segment. In units, the count looks almost even. In dollars — it doesn't.

Why the Base Model Outpaced Pro

Counterpoint analysts attribute the basic iPhone 17's leadership to two factors: price accessibility relative to the Pro lineup and expanded access to Apple Intelligence — a set of AI features that are either absent or limited on older models. In other words, the buyer got "enough AI" without paying extra for Pro.

"iPhone 17 in first place is no surprise. Apple always wins the first quarter after its fall launch. The real story is that Samsung is holding on thanks to cheap phones, not flagships."

— analyst, quoted via Explosion.com

Outside Pressure Invisible in the Chart

Behind the ranking — an unequal market. Due to memory shortages and trade tariffs, budget Android smartphone manufacturers faced a choice: absorb rising cost increases or pass them on to consumers, who are already price-sensitive. IDC Vice President Francisco Jeronimo noted that lower-segment manufacturers "will have no choice but to pass costs on to end consumers." Apple and Samsung are better protected from this pressure — and can grow their market share not through their own growth, but by squeezing out competitors.

  • Q1 2026: iPhone 17 — 6% of global sales, top-3 entirely held by Apple
  • Revenue: ~50% of the global smartphone market went to Apple
  • Samsung: 5 models in top-10, but all in the budget Galaxy A segment
  • iPhone 16: sixth place — the predecessor still in the chart

At WWDC 2026 in June, Apple is expected to reveal the next phase of Apple Intelligence development — including Siri features that haven't yet appeared. If the updates prove substantial, they could strengthen the case for upgrading for iPhone 15 and older users. If not — the question is whether brand momentum will be enough to maintain top positions in Q2, when Samsung launches an updated mid-range lineup in markets where Apple Intelligence is completely unavailable due to language restrictions.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026