Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

iPhone 17 Pro Max Passed NASA Certification — And It's More Complex Than It Seems

# Artemis II Astronauts Film Earth with Smartphone Disconnected from Internet and Without Bluetooth. How an iPhone Ended Up in Space — and Why It Took Months of Testing. Aboard the Orion spacecraft, Artemis II astronauts are filming Earth with a smartphone that cannot connect to the internet and has no Bluetooth capability. How an iPhone made it to space — and why it required months of testing.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 6, 2026 · 2 min read

iPhone 17 Pro Max Passed NASA Certification — And It's More Complex Than It Seems
Фото Землі з космосу, знятої на iPhone 17 Pro Max (Фото: NASA)

On the second day of the Artemis II mission, April 2, Commander Reid Wiseman and specialist Christina Koch took several photographs of Earth through the Orion spacecraft's window. The metadata of the photographs on NASA Flickr confirmed: shot with the front camera of an iPhone 17 Pro Max. This is the first case where a consumer smartphone has officially documented a crewed mission to deep space.

Why iPhone 17 — and only for photos

In February 2026, NASA announced that the iPhone 17 Pro Max for the first time received full qualification for extended use in orbit and beyond. Each of the four crew members received their own device. However, the functionality was intentionally limited: as the agency confirmed to the New York Times, the smartphones on board have no internet access and Bluetooth is disabled. Camera and local storage only.

Four phases — to ensure glass doesn't kill an astronaut

Tobias Niederwieser, research assistant at BioServe Space Technologies, an institute that previously went through similar approvals for cargo on Artemis I, described the certification process. According to him, the procedure is "quite lengthy and complex" and consists of four phases.

  • Phase 1. Introduction to NASA's safety panel — initial equipment assessment.
  • Phase 2. Analysis of potential hazards: moving parts, materials that could shatter. The screen glass is a separate item: fragments in zero gravity could get into an astronaut's face or block mechanisms.
  • Phase 3. Development of risk mitigation plans.
  • Phase 4. NASA validation tests to confirm the effectiveness of the measures.

Apple officially stated that it did not participate in the approval process — this was NASA's initiative. At the same time, the company acknowledged: Artemis II was the first case where its device received full qualification for extended use beyond Earth.

Nikon from 2016 alongside iPhone 2025

In parallel on board — a Nikon DSLR from 2016 and several GoPro cameras from a decade ago. These are considered the primary photographic equipment of the mission. The iPhone is a personal tool for the crew to document, not a replacement, but a supplement.

"The first time a smartphone in the pocket of most people photographs Earth from thousands of kilometers away."

Cult of Mac on Artemis II photos

NASA published the photographs in the "Journey to the Moon" gallery — along with a shot of the full Earth disk, where the aurora is visible over both poles and zodiacal light. This frame was taken shortly after the engine burn to set trajectory toward the Moon.

If NASA allows publishing video from the iPhone after the mission is completed — this would become the first consumer video from deep space. Whether the agency takes such a step depends on how the crew documents the return journey and how well the material meets the mission's public communication standards.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026