Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

iPhone Air made transparent and brought back the physical SIM — a technical trick with obvious risks

A Taiwanese blogger showed in a video how laser removal of the coating and micro‑soldering converted the eSIM version of the iPhone Air into a device with a physical nano‑SIM. Fascinating for geeks — risky for anyone who values warranty, security and reliable connectivity.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 24, 2026 · 2 min read

iPhone Air made transparent and brought back the physical SIM — a technical trick with obvious risks
Прозорий iPhone Air (Фото: скриншот)

What happened

In a YouTube video a Taiwanese blogger demonstrated two key modifications to the iPhone Air: he made the back panel completely transparent by removing the opaque coating using laser processing, and integrated a physical nano‑SIM tray into the housing of a model for which Apple provided only eSIM.

According to the video's author, during the work he preserved the MagSafe module, but the battery, logic board and other protective structural elements are now visible. To install the slot he had to make a cutout in the bottom of the case, remove the stock Taptic Engine and replace it with a more compact vibration motor, and connect the SIM reader to the board via micro‑soldering.

"The device works successfully with a physical SIM card and connects to the mobile network."

— Taiwanese blogger, author of the YouTube video

Technical consequences and risks

The modification looks impressive, but has a number of significant side effects. According to the author, the thermal pads were removed during processing, which changed heat dissipation: the smartphone throttles more quickly under load. The device also loses its factory water- and dust-resistance under the IP68 standard, and warranty service becomes invalid.

In addition, micro‑soldering and interference with radio-frequency circuits carry risks: unstable connections, interference or antenna damage can, in the long run, reduce connection quality. There are public cases where replacing and inserting slots into phones led to mobile connection problems for the end user.

What this means for users and the market

On the one hand, such tuning is an example of the ingenuity of communities and users' desire to have options (for example, a physical SIM). On the other hand, it is a clear reminder of the trade-off between aesthetics/functionality and reliability and service. For the average user the risks outweigh the benefits: loss of warranty, reduced performance under load and lack of water protection are strong arguments against such interventions.

From a broader perspective, incidents like this highlight the importance of service independence and repairability — topics that matter for Ukraine as well. Modding skills and local workshops can compensate for service shortages in crisis conditions, but systemic solutions (manufacturer-provided options, transparent warranty policies) would be a better outcome for consumers.

"It's an interesting technical trick, but not a recipe for daily use — especially if you rely on stable connectivity and service support."

— representative of the tech community/analyst

Summary: the modification attracts attention and demonstrates technical skill, but at the same time raises questions about safety, thermal management and service independence. Whether it's worth the risk depends on the user's priorities; but manufacturers and the market should listen to the demand for greater flexibility and repairability.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026