Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

Jackal without GPS: How an American missile is changing the rules of engagement in the electronic warfare zone

Northrop Grumman has revealed details of Jackal — a turbojet-powered missile that autonomously locates targets in areas of intense jamming. What threat does this pose and what conclusions should we draw today — briefly and to the point.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 26, 2026 · 2 min read

Jackal without GPS: How an American missile is changing the rules of engagement in the electronic warfare zone

What is known about Jackal

In the United States the Jackal was described in detail — a turbojet cruise missile from Northrop Grumman designed to operate in conditions of heavy electronic jamming. According to Army Recognition and the manufacturer's press release, the system can operate without GPS and without a constant link to an operator.

Key characteristics: **speed up to 600 km/h**, range of more than **100 km**, loiter time of about **15 minutes** for autonomous target detection. The modular design allows the missile to be equipped with either warheads or reconnaissance sensors or EW equipment. Launch can be carried out from land, sea, or air.

"The system is built to operate in areas with strong electronic jamming"

— Northrop Grumman, press release

Tactics and capabilities

The Jackal is described as a platform suitable for **swarm tactics**: several missiles coordinate routes and distribute targets among themselves without direct operator intervention. This reduces the effectiveness of traditional air defense systems, which are designed for individual trajectories and precise coordinates.

Autonomous navigation and sensing in conditions of communications blackout or heavy electronic interference mean less vulnerability to classic GPS jamming or interruption of communication channels. Combined with maneuverability and modularity, this makes the Jackal a tool for complex tactical operations on saturated fronts.

"Analysts point out that such platforms increase the importance of integrated air defense and intelligence systems"

— defense technology analyst

What this means for Ukraine

In short: **Ukrainian air defense and tactics must adapt**. The Jackal in the hands of an ally can become an effective tool in striking critical infrastructure or disabling the enemy's reconnaissance assets and air defenses precisely where conventional guidance systems do not work.

At the same time, the appearance of such missiles strengthens the case for multi-layered, integrated air defense: mobile interceptors, improved radar and intelligence, EW countermeasures and physical protection measures — all of this becomes critically important. Concurrently, the US has ordered interceptors for THAAD, and Rheinmetall is assessing the costs of creating a comprehensive multi-layered air defense — a sign that partners are preparing for a new type of threat.

Conclusion

The Jackal does not make the battlefield unequivocally favorable to anyone, but it changes the rules of the game. For Ukraine the key practical question is how quickly and flexibly we integrate intelligence, EW and interceptors into a single defensive architecture. The answer will affect how effectively we can neutralize or exploit similar platforms in the coming months.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026