Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

Only one dating app passed the security check — what it means for military personnel, volunteers and your data

A study by Nadiyno.org assessed Boo, Bumble, Kismia, Pure, and Tinder against 30 criteria. The result — a warning: the absence of basic security tools and extensive data collection put the privacy of millions of Ukrainians at risk, especially those working near the front lines.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

January 6, 2026 · 2 min read

Only one dating app passed the security check — what it means for military personnel, volunteers and your data

Check: 30 criteria — one “Reliable”

The Nadiyno.org team published a large-scale audit of the five most popular dating apps in Ukraine — Boo, Bumble, Kismia, Pure and Tinder. Experts evaluated technical protection, privacy policies and interaction safety across 30 criteria. The result is simple and alarming: only one service received a “Reliable” rating.

"None of the five apps support basic account protection features, in particular two-factor authentication or the ability to remotely end a session. In three of them hiding age and geolocation is available only by subscription."

— Nadiyno.org team, app security researchers

What exactly is worrying

Among the key risks are the lack of two-factor authentication, the inability to end sessions remotely, and paid access to privacy features. In some services (Tinder, Bumble, Kismia) hiding age or geolocation is not a basic option but a paid service. In the Ukrainian Kismia geolocation can effectively be "purchased." Bumble, according to the study, collects up to 27 types of data and shares 12 of them with third parties.

This is not an abstract problem: according to Rakuten Viber (2025), 67% of Ukrainians met their partner online. When dating moves into real life, the risks turn into real losses of privacy and security.

Why this matters specifically for Ukraine

Location data, habits and photos can be used for more than advertising. For military personnel, volunteers and people who work near the front, information leaks are a direct physical threat. Tinder's location accuracy previously allowed tracking a person to within 10–20 meters — a case that illustrates how dangerous technical flaws can be.

Additionally, only two of the five apps (Tinder and Kismia) provide safety instructions in Ukrainian — clearly insufficient in a country where online dating has become routine for millions.

What to do right now

For users: limit access to geolocation, do not show exact whereabouts, do not post sensitive photos, check permissions in your phone settings, use unique passwords and password managers. It's also important to respond to the security prompt: if an app does not offer 2FA or if privacy features are behind a paywall, treat it with caution.

For developers and regulators: the audit showed that minimum security standards are needed — mandatory two-factor authentication, an option to remotely end sessions, transparent data-sharing policies and safety instructions in Ukrainian. This is not only a technical issue — it is a matter of national security.

Conclusion

Dating services have become part of everyday life. When 67% of relationships start online, technical gaps become systemic risks. Whether this is enough to force developers and regulators to raise standards is a question we expect an answer to in the near future.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026