Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

MacBook Neo Is 8 Times Slower Than the Pro: What It Means for Buyers

The budget $599 MacBook Neo saves on the SSD — but at what cost to performance and time? We break down The Verge’s tests and explain who should take notice.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 11, 2026 · 2 min read

MacBook Neo Is 8 Times Slower Than the Pro: What It Means for Buyers
MacBook Neo (Фото: Apple)

Budget price, noticeable compromise on speed

The new MacBook Neo starts at $599 — but benchmark measurements show its SSD runs significantly slower than the drives in the new MacBook Air and MacBook Pro. These aren't just benchmark numbers: storage speed directly affects app launch times, copying large files, and system responsiveness when RAM is limited.

"Test results show the storage speed in the budget laptop can be up to eight times lower."

— The Verge

What testers measured

According to tests, the MacBook Neo with the A18 Pro chip and a 256 GB drive showed roughly 1735 MB/s read and 1684 MB/s write. For comparison: the MacBook Air with M5 (1 TB SSD) — about 7049 MB/s read and 7480 MB/s write, while the MacBook Pro with M5 Max reaches 13.6 GB/s read and 17.8 GB/s write.

Practical consequence: copying a 100 GB file on the Neo can take around a minute, whereas on the Air — roughly 30 seconds, and on the Pro — only a few seconds.

Why this matters for the user

SSD affects more than just file transfer speed. macOS uses part of the SSD as virtual memory if RAM is insufficient (for example, when 8 GB are filled by active work). In such cases a fast drive compensates for lack of RAM; a slower SSD means noticeable delays during intensive tasks.

What’s behind Apple’s decision

Component cost savings and product segmentation are standard tools for a manufacturer covering different price niches. A slower controller or storage interface lets Apple reduce device cost and avoid cannibalizing sales of higher-end models.

Analysts note this also serves to more clearly differentiate the lineup — Neo for basic tasks, Air for general-purpose work, Pro for professional workloads.

Buyer advice (especially in Ukraine)

If you work with large files — video, project graphics, virtual machines — or frequently run into RAM shortages, investing in an Air or Pro is justified: they save you time. If you need an inexpensive device for office tasks, email and browsing — the Neo will provide basic functionality for a modest sum.

Also consider that Apple removes power adapters in certain regions (the EU and the UK), and other models in the line have different battery life and memory configurations: the MacBook Air with M5 is rated up to 18 hours, and the MacBook Pro 2026 with M5 Pro starts at $2199 with a 1 TB SSD.

Conclusion

The difference in SSD speed is not a technical triviality but a real impact on how quickly you work. Apple clearly prioritizes between models: savings for the mass segment and maximum performance for professionals. Now the choice is up to the buyer: are you willing to pay more for seconds of efficiency that, in professional tasks, turn into hours of work?

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026