Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

New Glenn deployed satellite to wrong orbit: Blue Origin records first mission failure

The third launch of the heavy-lift New Glenn rocket became the first failure in terms of results — the communications satellite BlueBird 7 ended up in the wrong orbit and will now burn up in the atmosphere. The booster landed perfectly, but the upper stage failed to perform.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 20, 2026 · 2 min read

New Glenn deployed satellite to wrong orbit: Blue Origin records first mission failure
Ракета New Glenn (Фото: Blue Origin)

On April 19, 2026, Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin for the first time in history relaunched the New Glenn rocket — and simultaneously failed its primary mission for the first time. The first stage "Never Tell Me the Odds" successfully returned to a floating platform in the Atlantic. The upper stage placed the satellite in the wrong orbit.

What Went Wrong

The BlueBird 7 communications satellite, developed by Texas-based AST SpaceMobile, was supposed to reach a circular orbit of 460 × 460 km with an inclination of 49.4°. Instead, according to astrophysicist Jonathan McDowell, citing U.S. Space Force tracking data, the satellite entered an orbit of 154 × 494 km with an inclination of 36.1° — wrong in both altitude and plane.

"BlueBird 7 was placed into a lower orbit than planned by the launch vehicle's upper stage. Although the satellite separated and established contact, the altitude is too low to sustain operations using its onboard propulsion system."

— AST SpaceMobile, official statement

The satellite's own engines are insufficient to raise the orbit to operational altitude. The satellite will have to be deorbited — it will burn up in the dense layers of the atmosphere.

Whose Money and What's Next

BlueBird 7 is insured for 30 million dollars — the amount AST SpaceMobile expects to receive from its insurance policy. Blue Origin, meanwhile, announced that it is "evaluating the anomaly": the cause of the upper stage failure has not been officially named, and the investigation is ongoing.

The loss is painful for AST SpaceMobile in context: the company is building a direct-to-smartphone communications constellation and expects to have approximately 45 satellites in orbit by the end of 2026 at a launch cadence of once every one to two months. BlueBird 7 was supposed to be the second Block 2 generation satellite — ten times more powerful than the previous generation in terms of bandwidth. A replacement, according to the company, will be ready for the next launch.

Context for Blue Origin

New Glenn debuted in January 2025: reached orbit, booster didn't land. Second launch — orbit achieved, landing achieved. Third launch — booster landed again, but the mission failed. Industry analysts note: SpaceX won the market not only with first-stage recovery, but also with upper-stage reliability. Blue Origin has so far proven only the first part.

Blue Origin CEO Dave Limp noted before the launch that all seven engines on the upgraded booster had been replaced and several improvements had been tested. The irony: the very component that wasn't publicly updated is what failed.

If Blue Origin doesn't establish the cause of the upper stage failure before the next commercial launch — the queue of clients that the company is actively building up under its ambitious 2026 schedule will have grounds to reconsider contracts in favor of carriers with proven reliability statistics.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026