Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

Ground Drone Operator at GUR: A New Combat Role Emerges Between Pilot and Infantryman

The tactical group "Revenge" as part of the GUR is transitioning ground robotic systems from logistics to assault operations—and in doing so is forming a list of skills that don't fit into any existing military specialty.

Oleg Bazylewicz

By Oleg Bazylewicz

May 22, 2026 · 2 min read

Ground Drone Operator at GUR: A New Combat Role Emerges Between Pilot and Infantryman
НРК Droid TW-7.62 (Фото: DevDroid)

When the 3rd Assault Brigade describes the training school for ground-based robotic complex (GRC) operators, the first thing that stands out is the queue. People come to study before their units even have an official position for such a specialist. The demand for a specialist who formally doesn't yet exist is a precise marker that combat practice is outpacing the organizational structure of the military.

What a GRC operator actually does in the combat zone

In the "Revenge" tactical group—a GHUR unit—ground drones have long since gone beyond logistics. According to DevDroid, GRCs are used for assault and strike operations, including complexes equipped with combat modules and kamikaze vehicles. Deputy commander of the GRC section with the callsign Koka explains: an operator must assess terrain, plot routes in real time, and constantly account for enemy FPV-drone activity and reconnaissance.

This is not remote control from the rear. This is tactical decision-making under the threat of equipment destruction.

"Operation of GRCs with combat modules and GRC-kamikaze vehicles in combat conditions, teamwork with UAV pilots"

— from the official list of duties of a GRC operator, "Revenge" tactical group

Skills that don't exist in any charter

The actual profile of a GRC operator today encompasses several disciplines simultaneously:

  • Terrain reading and route planning — taking into account cover, elevation, mud, obstacles, which real equipment overcomes with limited passability.
  • Technical maintenance — replacing parts, adjusting tracks, basic mechanics. At the 3rd Assault Brigade school, this is a separate mandatory phase: cadets personally repair the vehicles.
  • Multi-domain teamwork with UAVs — synchronizing ground complex operations with an aerial drone significantly increases accuracy and threat response.
  • Countering enemy electronics — routes are planned with consideration of enemy FPV and reconnaissance drone coverage zones.
  • Work with maps and software — route analysis and development using specialized programs, not hand-drawn on paper.

GRCs in 2025 — where UAVs were in 2023

Ground robotic complexes are currently at approximately the same stage where unmanned aerial vehicles were at the beginning of 2023: already in combat, but not yet scaled. According to DevDroid, the Droid TW 12.7 GRC operated by soldiers from NC13 company of the 3rd Assault Brigade completely replaced one infantry position and held it for a month and a half.

More than 150 military personnel—from the Armed Forces, GHUR, National Police, Border Service, and National Guard—have already completed training at the 3rd Assault Brigade school since the full course launch. The problem is not in the technology or lack of volunteers. The bottleneck is the absence of a systematic ecosystem: workshops, logistics, standardized training programs, and actual official positions.

If the military establishes the position of GRC operator in the staffing structure and standardized training appears for it—the field will gain conditions for the same breakthrough that UAVs achieved in two years. If not, units will continue to train operators on their own, already during combat operations.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026