Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

Paradox of Power: Ukrainian IT Chose Grammarly, Nvidia and mono as Leaders for 2025

The paradox of war — they're trying to break us, while our IT market is building the future. DOU showed: Grammarly, Nvidia and mono are the most attractive employers of 2025. Why this matters for the country's economy and defense — in the article.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

December 16, 2025 · 2 min read

Paradox of Power: Ukrainian IT Chose Grammarly, Nvidia and mono as Leaders for 2025

The paradox of war: they try to break us, but we grow stronger. DOU has once again recorded where our talents aim to go — and it's more than an employer ranking. It's a signal: where the future of the economy, technology and, ultimately, our strategic resilience is being formed.

Who ended up at the top

In the annual DOU survey, Grammarly became the leader for the third time in a row — 38% of respondents would very much like to work there, despite layoffs and rebranding. In second place is Nvidia (36%), third — mono (34%). The top also includes MacPaw, Ajax Systems, SoftServe, Genesis, Uklon, Epam, GlobalLogic, N-iX, Intellias and others. The only company that noticeably climbed the ranks was Solidgate.

Western analysts and market insiders note: this choice is not just about brand, but about the vector of the industry's development. When specialists vote with their feet, they determine where investments, knowledge and technological competencies will go.

This is a historic moment: top employers show where Ukraine's competitive economy is being built — and where our technological shield is growing.

– DOU insider

Where our people are heading

Candidate behavior varies by level and region. Senior specialists are more selective; Juniors and newcomers are more open to a wide range of companies. In Kyiv, Grammarly, mono and MacPaw are mentioned most often; Lviv gravitates toward Ajax Systems and Diia; in Dnipro Rozetka, Nova Digital and large service companies are popular. IT professionals abroad more often prefer service players — EPAM and Sigma Software.

Specializations also determine choice: developers most often choose Nvidia, mono and Grammarly; QA engineers — SoftServe, Intellias and GlobalLogic; and HR, marketing and sales — product companies Preply, Slelar, Reface and BetterMe.

What this means for the country

Everyone draws the same conclusion: the IT market remains a key resource for economic recovery and for sustaining defense capability. A third of developers have already moved into the field of artificial intelligence — this is a direct investment in Ukraine's technological potential. Even if the average salary of managers has slightly fallen — from $3,150 to about $3,000 over half a year — the industry continues to retain key personnel and generate the knowledge the state needs.

Experts reiterate: when our IT people choose employers, they are not only looking for comfort and salary — they are building an ecosystem capable of withstanding any trials. The world notices this, and investors are watching these signals closely.

Bottom line: the DOU ranking is not just a list for dreamers. It's a roadmap where Ukrainian talents decide how and in whom to invest their efforts. And this determines not only the careers of individuals, but the future of our nation.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026