Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

Over 70% of Ukrainians Have Adapted Their Homes to Outages — What It Means for Safety and the Market

A Rakuten Viber survey of over 30,000 respondents found that the majority of Ukrainians have already made or plan to make energy upgrades to their homes. We examine how this will affect everyday life, the market, and government policy.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 2, 2026 · 2 min read

Over 70% of Ukrainians Have Adapted Their Homes to Outages — What It Means for Safety and the Market
Ілюстративне фото: Depositphotos

The Hook

Rakuten Viber conducted a poll on its official channel — more than 30,000 respondents took part. The result is simple but important: more than 70% of Ukrainians have either already adapted their homes to outages or plan to do so. These figures change the agenda for businesses and authorities.

What the poll showed

According to Rakuten Viber (via LIGA.net), 61% of respondents do not need additional charging during outages — their existing sources or device charge are sufficient. The other 39% are seeking solutions: 29% charge at work, 6% at resilience hubs, and 4% in cafés or co‑working spaces.

How Ukrainians are changing their homes

45% of respondents plan further adaptations to their homes; another 27% say they have already done everything possible for energy independence. Only 21% do not plan any changes, 4% expect the situation to improve, and 3% are considering relocation. The key age group is 34–45 years; more than half of respondents are under 45.

"In an anonymous poll on the official Rakuten Viber Ukraine channel, more than 30,000 respondents took part."

— Rakuten Viber, via LIGA.net

Why it matters

This is more than statistics about chargers. Mass adaptation of housing means rising demand for batteries, generators, energy storage systems, and energy‑efficient solutions. For businesses — new niches and services; for the state — the challenge of providing support to vulnerable households so that energy independence does not become a privilege only for those who can afford it.

Context

The data emerged against the backdrop of real problems with energy supply: the mayor of Kharkiv complained about outages in buildings without heating, and on February 10 a regional emergency in the energy sector was declared in Kharkiv Oblast. These events are strengthening citizens' desire for individual solutions and accelerating the micro‑energy market.

Implications and forecast

Analytically, this means three things: first, demand for household energy storage solutions will grow; second, there will be a need for government programs for low‑income households; third, companies that adapt quickly (battery installation services, insulation, mobile charging points) will gain an advantage in the market.

If policy and funding do not keep up with this demand, the social burden will only increase. So the question is not only who has a spare power bank — but who will ensure energy resilience for everyone.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026