Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

PrSM Inc. 2 has flown 350 km: HIMARS can now strike ships — why this matters for Ukraine

Lockheed Martin conducted the first flight tests of the PrSM Increment 2, which traveled roughly 350 km and validated targeting of moving maritime targets. The emergence of this capability alters the operational radius of HIMARS subsystems and has direct implications for Black Sea security and partners’ ability to support Ukraine.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

March 13, 2026 · 2 min read

PrSM Inc. 2 has flown 350 km: HIMARS can now strike ships — why this matters for Ukraine
Нова версія ракети PrSM (Фото: Lockheed Martin)

Test and key findings

Lockheed Martin reports the first flight tests of the Precision Strike Missile Increment 2 (PrSM Inc. 2), which was launched from an M142 HIMARS launcher. During the test the missile traveled approximately 350 km and validated systems capable of tracking moving ground and sea targets.

The new variant received a multimode seeker. In one phase of flight the missile uses inertial navigation and GPS to reach the target area, and in the terminal phase it switches to sensor-based guidance — a passive radio-frequency sensor and an infrared system. This enables strikes not only on fixed coordinates but also on moving objects, including ships and mobile equipment.

"The test confirmed PrSM Inc. 2's ability to combine range and guidance on moving targets — an important step in the development of precision strike capabilities"

— Lockheed Martin, press office

Compatibility and next steps

The missile is compatible with HIMARS and M270A2 MLRS launchers, meaning it can be employed on existing platforms already in service or held by partners. The program continues its testing phases; new flight tests are planned for later in 2026.

Why this matters for Ukraine

This testing is important not only technically: the emergence of PrSM with the ability to engage maritime targets expands the range of missions for mobile missile subsystems and alters the balance of strike capabilities in the region. For Ukraine this implies two practical takeaways.

First, potential provision of, or cooperation in supplying, such systems would strengthen deterrence capabilities in the maritime zone — especially in the Black and Azov Seas. Second, the system's effectiveness will depend not only on the missile itself, but also on integration with reconnaissance, counter-battery and maritime sensors, logistics, and command.

Experts note that technological progress is only the first step; turning it into an operational advantage requires political decisions, practical contracts, and personnel training.

Conclusion

PrSM Inc. 2 with a range of approximately 350 km and the ability to guide onto moving maritime targets is a technological bid to expand the combat potential of HIMARS and compatible platforms. For Ukraine it is important to monitor not only the technical results of tests, but also the diplomatic and supply dynamics of partners: from declarations to contract signings and practical integration into the defense architecture.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026