Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

Robot Ran Faster Than a Human — But the Rules Allowed It to Stop and Change Battery

A humanoid robot Honor completed a 21-kilometer half-marathon in Beijing in 50:26, breaking Ugandan Jacob Kiplimo's record by seven minutes. The progress is impressive, but the comparison is manipulative.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

April 20, 2026 · 2 min read

Robot Ran Faster Than a Human — But the Rules Allowed It to Stop and Change Battery
Ілюстративне фото: Depositphotos

On April 19, the second humanoid robot half-marathon took place in Beijing's Yichuan district. The winner — autonomous robot Flash from Chinese smartphone manufacturer Honor — crossed the finish line in 50 minutes and 26 seconds. This is faster than the record set by Ugandan runner Jacob Kiplimo (57:20) in Lisbon last month.

One Year — Three Times Faster

The progress between the two editions of the competition is the main news. Last year's winner Tiangong Ultra completed the distance in 2 hours and 40 minutes — approximately three times slower than this year's result. The number of participating teams increased to over 100.

But a record is only a record under equal conditions. And here we should pause.

What Actually Happened on the Course

Robots and humans ran in separate lanes to avoid collisions. Some robots moved gracefully, imitating famous athletes, while others had more basic capabilities.

According to the rules, each team could have up to three support staff members who were allowed to intervene — after judge confirmation — in cases of battery replacement, switching to a backup robot, or if a robot fell. In other words, a technical stop in the middle of the distance — not disqualification, but a scenario provided for in the regulations.

The winner Flash crashed into a fence near the finish line — it was picked up and ran to the finish line.

"My machine also beats a cheetah"

— a comment on social media cited by TechCrunch

About 40% of robots competed autonomously, while the remaining 60% were remotely controlled. Another Honor robot finished in 48:19, but it was remotely controlled — which is why the autonomous Flash with a result of 50:26 became the winner after applying a weighted coefficient.

Chinese Robotics: Pace, Not Slogans

In scope, this is more than just a sporting spectacle. The organizers introduced a coefficient of 1.2 for results of remotely controlled robots — to encourage teams to invest in autonomy rather than rely on operators. In other words, the regulatory design of the competition consciously accelerates the technological race.

In parallel: the Honor robot maintained an average speed of approximately 25 km/h throughout the entire distance. For comparison — Kiplimo's average speed during his record was approximately 22 km/h.

If next year the organizers ban any intervention by support staff during the run and make it mandatory to start from a single battery charge — and the robot still sets a record — then comparison with a human would become valid.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026