Tuesday, May 26, 2026
Today's Edition

EveryNews

Stories that matter, signal over noise

Technologies

Samsung delays Galaxy A37 and A57 until March — what it means for the market and buyers

The mid-range announcement that was expected in February has been postponed to March. We explain why this is more than just a date change and how it will affect availability and the choices of Ukrainian buyers.

Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

By Tetiana Suchkova-Ladik

February 19, 2026 · 2 min read

Samsung delays Galaxy A37 and A57 until March — what it means for the market and buyers
Рендери смартфонів Galaxy A37 та Galaxy A57 (Фото: @saaaanjjjuuu в соцмережі X)

Brief and important

Samsung has postponed the presentation of the Galaxy A37 and Galaxy A57 models — while they were previously expected in the first half of February, insiders now predict a March release without an exact date. This decision appears technically justified, but it has several practical consequences worth knowing about right now.

Why it was delayed

The main reason is synchronization with the launch of the flagship Galaxy S26 series, whose presentation is scheduled for February 25. Market observers believe Samsung wants to avoid cannibalizing attention and media space: unveiling a budget‑to‑midrange lineup in the shadow of flagships rarely yields maximum sales and PR impact.

This decision is typical for global manufacturers: they first concentrate attention on flagships, then return to mass-market models to optimize supply logistics and marketing budgets.

What is known about the specs

Galaxy A37: 6.7" AMOLED FHD+ with 120 Hz, Exynos 1480 chip, 50 MP main camera (1/1.56" sensor), 8 MP ultrawide, 5 MP macro and 12 MP front. 5000 mAh battery with 45W support, claimed IP67 protection.

Galaxy A57: 6.6" flat AMOLED 120 Hz, Exynos 1680 chip, UFS 3.1 storage, 50 MP main camera with optical image stabilization, 12 MP ultrawide, 5 MP macro, 12 MP front, 5000 mAh battery with 45W, IP68 protection, 6.9 mm thickness, 182 g weight.

"Postponing announcements at such times is not about device problems, but about managing market attention and optimizing supply chains. For a brand, the right launch conditions are important so that models receive proper competition on the shelf."

— Oleksiy Melnyk, mobile technology market analyst

What this means for Ukraine

First, buyers may experience a delay in availability of the new models in retail chains and from carriers. Second, if Samsung concentrates marketing around the S26, this could temporarily nudge part of the audience toward buying the flagship or postponing upgrades until spring.

For importers and local sellers this is a time to adjust supply plans and pricing policy — a slight price increase is possible due to supply chain shifts or, conversely, promotions to clear inventory before new shipments.

Conclusion

Postponing the release of the Galaxy A37 and A57 is a logical move in Samsung's strategy, aimed at optimizing the impact of launches. For the Ukrainian market this means a short wait and an opportunity to reconsider options: buy now in the available segment or wait for the official March announcement, when prices and regional sale dates will become known. Following the brand’s official communications and local retailers is currently the best investment of time for a buyer.

Related

Latest

Business

EU Against Google: Why the Latest Fine Could Change More Than Previous Ones

# European Regulators Target Google Again — This Time Over Digital Markets Act Violations. What's Behind the Accusations and Why It Matters Beyond the Corporation European regulators have renewed their scrutiny of Google, this time focusing on alleged violations of the Digital Markets Act. The charges underscore Brussels' increasingly aggressive stance on big tech monopolies and what officials say are anticompetitive practices. The accusations center on how Google leverages its dominance across multiple digital services — from search to advertising to mobile platforms — to disadvantage competitors. Regulators claim the company is using its market power in ways that stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. The case carries significance far beyond Google itself. It signals how the EU is attempting to enforce its landmark Digital Markets Act, legislation designed to curb the gatekeeping power of tech giants. A potential penalty could set precedent for how other large technology companies face similar scrutiny. For consumers and smaller tech firms, the outcome could reshape the digital landscape by creating more room for competition. For Google, fines and operational restrictions could fundamentally alter its business model in Europe, the world's most stringent regulatory market. The case also reflects a broader geopolitical divide, with the EU pursuing a regulatory approach that contrasts sharply with the lighter-touch oversight favored in the United States.

May 26, 2026